All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) frequently harbors copy number alterations (CNAs) of 9p24.1, including chromosomal amplification, copy number gain, polysomy, or translocation. 9p24.1 CNAs have also been detected in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and primary testicular lymphoma (PTL).
CNAs of 9p24.1 result in the overexpression of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), PD-L2, and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). The interaction between PD-L1/PD-L2 and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor on T cells negatively regulate T cell-mediated immunity and a variety of cancers, by upregulating expression of PD-L1, evade immune surveillance. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab, two immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, have demonstrated efficacy in relapsed and/or refractory cHL, and also in PMBCL, PCNSL, and PTL.
9p24.1 CNAs have also been observed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but little is known about the molecular significance or the impact on clinical outcome. In a paper published in Blood Cancer Journal, Yucai Wang and colleagues analyzed the frequency of 9p24.1 CNA in untreated newly diagnosed DLBCL, its association with the expression of PD-L1, PD-L2 and JAK2, and its correlation with clinical variables and outcome.1
Patients (n = 199) with newly diagnosed DLBCL from May 2002 to September 2012 were included in the study. All patients were treated with standard immunochemotherapy and followed prospectively.
The frequency of 9p24.1 CNA was determined using whole-exome sequencing (WES; n = 57) data, or OncoScan™ (n = 142) and only cases with PDCD1LG2/PD-L2, CD274/PD-L1, and JAK2 gain were evaluated
Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis was performed to confirm the WES/OncoScan results. Of the 20 cases with gain or amplification, only nine (amplification, n = 4; gain, n = 5) had samples available for FISH
Thus, taken together the WES/OncoScan and FISH results identified 6.5% (n = 13) cases of copy number gain in 9p24.1, and 3.5% (n = 7) 9p24.1 amplification cases
The expression of CD274/PD-L1, PDCD1LG2/PD-L2, and JAK2 was evaluated using RNASeq data on 31 of the cases used for CNA analysis:
Protein levels of PD-L1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry in 19 of the cases used for CNA analysis:
Thus, suggesting that increased PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression correlate with chromosomal amplification of 9p24.1.
Clinical characteristics of patients with amplifications, gains, or no gain were compared to evaluate whether 9p24.1 CNA correlates with clinical features in DLBCL:
Clinical outcome after standard immunochemotherapy (such as R-CHOP), at median follow-up of 95 months, is shown in Table 1. Patients with 9p24.1 amplification showed a trend of better event-free survival (EFS) in comparison with no gain patients. On the contrary, patients with a gain of 9p24.1 had worse EFS than no gain patients, suggesting a different impact of 9p24.1 amplification and gain on clinical outcome.
Table 1. Clinical outcome after standard immunotherapy at a median follow-up of 95 months.
EFS |
Amplification (n = 7) |
No gain (n = 179) |
Gain (n = 13) |
Median EFS, months |
NR |
116.5 |
54.7 |
2-year EFS, % |
85.7 |
68.5 |
53.8 |
5-year EFS, % |
85.7 |
59.1 |
46.2 |
p value |
0.138 |
|
0.513 |
EFS, Event-free survival; NR, not reached |
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox