All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

AACR 2017 | Poster 4672/3 – Novel epigenetic approach to relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma based on dual inhibition of EZH1/EZH2

By Terri Penfold

Share:

Apr 13, 2017


At the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting in Washington, DC, USA, on Tuesday 4th April, a poster session titled “Epigenetics and DNA Repair” took place.

One of the posters on display (4672 / 3) was titled “Novel epigenetic approach to relapsed mantle cell lymphoma based on dual inhibition of EZH1/EZH2” by Shuhei Fujita from the National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, and colleagues.

The group used OR-S1, a novel dual inhibitor of EZH1/2, to demonstrate that EZH1/2 inhibition is an encouraging therapeutic strategy for MCL. In addition to in vitro assays using MCL cell lines, they orally administered OR-S1 to a xenograft (PDX) murine model, using cells from a heavily pretreated and relapsed MCL patient.

Key Highlights:

  • In vitro assays using MCL cell lines demonstrated that OR-S1 inhibited cell growth; the effect was much greater than administration of the single EZH2 inhibitor (GSK126)
  • IC50 of OR-S1 was about one tenth of GSK126
  • In further analyses of MCL cell lines, those exposed to OR-S1 underwent cell cycle arrest (at G1)
  • A dose-dependent reduction in phosphorylated Retinoblastoma protein and cell differentiation was observed
  • Administration of OR-S1 increased cell surface expression of hCD138
  • RNA-seq analysis of MCL cell lines indicated that cell cycle-related signaling was significantly affected and that CDKN1C (TP57) was one of the genes most markedly upregulated by OR-S1
  • ChIP qPCR of MCL cell lines demonstrated that the CDKN1C locus was strongly marked by H3K27 tri-methylation; OR-S1 induced a significant reduction in the level of this histone marker
  • OR-S1 strongly inhibited proliferation of patient-derived tumors; no serious side effects reported
  • Administration of OR-S1 alone to PDX mice induced increased expression of CDKN1C

In summary, dual inhibition of EZH1/2 increases CDKN1C expression, resulting in cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell growth in MCL. The poster was concluded by stating that the data presented indicates that dual inhibition of EZH1/2 is a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with MCL.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?