All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
The ‘Hematologic Malignancies-Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia’ poster discussion session took place on Monday June 6, 2016, between 13:15–14:45. The session was jointly chaired by Susan Mary O’Brien, MD, Associate Director for Clinical Science, at Chao Comprehensive Cancer Center in the University of Irvine, California, and John Leonard, MD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, New-York.
Pr Thorsten Zenz , MD, of the Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Germany, presented a poster titled ‘Small molecule therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia’. This poster presentation discussed abstracts 7519, 7520 and 7521.
Abstract 7519: Venetoclax Activity in CLL Patients Who Have Relapsed After or Are Refractory to Ibrutinib or Idelalisib
CLL patients who experience relapse after or become refractory to BCR inhibitors have been found to have abysmal prognosis. One such BCR inhibitor is venetoclax (VEN), a selective, oral inhibitor of BCL2, which has been found to have robust activity in R/R CLL.
In this abstract, the results of an ongoing phase II study (NCT02141282) investigating venetoclax (20mg daily followed by a 5-week ramp up yo 400mg daily) in CLL patrients R/R to ibrutinib (IBR; Arm A) or idelalisib (IDE; Arm B). ORR by iwCLL criteria and safety were the primary endpoints of this study.
|
Ibrutinib Arm (n=43) |
Idelalisib Arm (n=21) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Best response, n(%) |
Assessed by |
Assessed by |
||
Investigator |
IRC |
Investigator |
IRC |
|
ORR |
26 (61) |
30 (70) |
7 (33) |
10 (48) |
CR/CRi |
2 (5) / 0 |
0 / 1 (2) |
1 (5) / 1 (5) |
0 / 0 |
PR |
22 (51) |
29 (67) |
5 (24) |
10 (47) |
SD |
12 (28) |
- |
12 (57) |
- |
PD |
1 (2) |
- |
1 (5) |
- |
Non-responder |
- |
13 (30) |
- |
11 (52) |
It was concluded that treatment with single-agent VEN resulted in encouraging responses in CLL patients R/R to IBR or IDE. This included MRD-negativity at 24 weeks, as well as an acceptable safety profile. This is the first prospective study to demonstrate efficacy in this poor prognosis population. Follow-up will assess depth and duration of response.
Abstract 7520: Outcomes in Ibrutinib by Line of Therapy in Patients with CLL: Analyses From Phase III Data
IBR was the first-in-class Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in CLL patients who had received one or more previous therapies. In this abstract, analysis was presented on outcomes with IBR based on prior lines of therapy and after discontinuation in CLL patients. Data from two phase III trials was analyzed: the RESONATE (in patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed CLL) and RESONATE-2 (in previously treated CLL patients, excluding those with del(17p) trials.
*5 pts who discontinued study IBR to receive commercial IBR not included. |
||||
Subgroups by Prior LoT (N = 271) |
||||
0 (n = 136) |
1 (n = 27) |
2 (n = 41) |
≥ 3 (n = 67) |
|
Med age, yrs (range) |
73 (65-89) |
64 (30-85) |
66 (46-86) |
67 (44-83) |
Med follow up, m (max) |
22 (32+) |
30 (36+) |
31 (34+) |
30 (37+) |
Continuing study ibr, n (%)* |
116 (85) |
19 (70) |
28 (68) |
36 (54) |
24-mo PFS, % |
92 |
89 |
80 |
69 |
30-mo OS, % |
97 |
93 |
83 |
82 |
ORR (w/PR-L), % |
91 |
100 |
93 |
88 |
CR/CRi |
17 |
7 |
15 |
6 |
PR-L |
3 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
DC due to, n (%)* |
||||
PD |
4 (3) |
2 (7) |
5 (12) |
11 (16) |
AEs |
13 (10) |
1 (4) |
6 (15) |
7 (10) |
Deaths |
2 (2) |
2 (7) |
1 (2) |
5 (7) |
Other |
1 (1) |
2 (7) |
1 (2) |
4 (6) |
Med time post DC*, m |
||||
Follow up |
9 |
5 |
9 |
10 |
OS |
NR |
NR |
9 |
7 |
OS: DC due to AE |
NR |
NR |
16 |
NR |
OS: DC due to PD |
NR |
NR |
8 |
6 |
Pts/w subsequent therapy, n |
4 |
1 |
6 |
11 |
Common subsequent therapy |
2 FCR, 1 BR, |
1 EPOCH-R |
3 R-CHOP |
4 idela±R, |
In conclucion, IBR resulted in favorable PFS and OS, and high ORR irrespective of line of therapy in CLL patients. Patients who recieved first or second line IBR were less likely to experience progressive disease and had superior post-IBR survival outcomes.
Abstract 7521: Acalabrutinib, a second-generation bruton tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor, in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
BTK is involved in BCR signaling and is a key target for therapy for CLL. Acalabrutinib is an irreversible, selectibr BTK inhibitor. This abstract contained preliminary results of the ongoing phase I–II CLL-001 study (NCT02029443) of single-agent acalarutinib in newly diagnosed CLL patients. Patients were administered oral acalabrutinib at 100mg BID (n = 62) or 200mg QD (n = 37). CLL responses were assessed per modified iwCLL criteria; results of the first 74 treated patients, including 72 evaluable for response.
Primary endpoints of the study were safety and progressive disease (BTK occupancy) and secondary objectives were ORR, DoR, and PFS.
|
N = 72 |
Best response, n(%) |
|
CR |
0 |
PR |
63 (87.5) |
PRL |
7 (10) |
SD |
2 (3) |
ORR (CR+PR), n(%; 95% CI) |
63 (87.5; 95% CI, 78–94) |
ORR (CR+PR+PRL), n(%; 95% CI) |
70 (97; 95% CI, 90–100) |
It was concluded that acalabrutinib acheived high response rates and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Based on these results, a phase III trial has commenced (NCT02029443).
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox