All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASH 2017 | Pooled analysis results of ibrutinib therapy in R/R MCL patients for a median of 3.5 years

Dec 11, 2017


The 59th Annual Meeting & Exposition of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) took place in Atlanta, GA, on 9–12 December 2017. On December 9th, an oral abstract session was held on “Mantle Cell, Follicular, and Other Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma—Clinical Studies: Mantle Cell Lymphoma, New Therapies”. This session was moderated by Jonathon B Cohen, Emory University - Winship Cancer Institute and Craig A. Portell, University of Virginia.

Abstract #151 was presented during this session, titled “Median 3.5-Year Follow-up of Ibrutinib Treatment in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis” by Simon Rule, Plymouth University Medical School, UK, and colleagues. This article is based on data presented at the live session, which may supersede information in the pre-published ASH Abstract.

The analysis showed 370 patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who received one (n = 99) or more (n = 271) prior lines of ibrutinib therapy across three studies (SPARK, RAY and PCYC-1104). The authors noted that patients who had been treated with ibrutinib at first relapse or progression had better outcomes.

Study Highlights

  • Overall, 370 patients were enrolled in this pooled analysis CAN3001 (NCT01804686):
    • 115 patients (31.1%) were treated with ibrutinib for ≥ 2 years: 32 of them were treated for 2 to > 3 years (27.8%), 43 patients were treated for 3 to > 4 years and 40 patients for ≥ 4 years (34.8%)
    • Median ibrutinib exposure = 46.3 months (28.8–72.1)
  • Patients received 560 mg ibrutinib once daily with a median follow-up: 41.1 months (95% CI, 37.3–42.5)
  • Median PFS overall: 13.0 (95% CI, 8.4–16.8) months
  • Median OS overall: 26.7 (95% CI, 22.5–38.4) months
  • Overall Response Rates (ORR) by best response:
    • ORR in all patients: 69.7%, 26.5 % achieved Complete Response (CR), 43.2% received Partial Response (PR)
    • ORR in patients with 1 prior line of therapy: 77.8%, CR: 36.4%, PR: 41.4%
    • ORR in patients with > 1 prior line of therapy: 66.8%, CR: 22.9%, PR: 43.9%
  • Duration of Response (DOR) by best response and line of therapy
    • DOR in all patients: 22.2 (95%CI, 16.5–28.8) months, CR: 55.7% (95% CI, 55.7–NE), PR: 10.4% (95% CI, 7.7–14.9)
    • DOR in patients with 1 prior line of therapy: 34.4 (95% CI, 23.1–NE) months, CR: 55.7 % (95% CI, 33.1–NE), PR: 22.1% (95% CI, 10.6–34.4)
    • DOR in patients with > 1 prior line of therapy: 16.0 (95% CI, 12.9–23.5) months, CR: NE (95%CI, 40.7–NE), PR: 8.5 (6.2–12.1)
  • 2-year PFS and OS for patients who had received only 1 prior line of therapy
    • 2 years PFS: 57% (95% CI, 0.31–0.42)
    • 2 years OS: 68% (95% CI, 0.47–0.58)

Safety

  • Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) grade ≥ 3 = 79.7% of patients
  • Most common TEAEs: neutropenia 17.0%, thrombocytopenia 12.2%, pneumonia 11.9%
  • Secondary malignancies: 9.7%, mostly non-melanoma skin cancer
  • The speaker commented on atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring in 5.1% of patients stating that patients in the study had significant cardiac risk factors including a history of AF. He added that the majority of these patients did not have a recurrence of AF or arrhythmia and that bleeding and AF was managed so that only a few (<2%) required a dose reduction or treatment discontinuation

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?