All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Biologics License Application for Rixathon (rituximab biosimilar) accepted for review by FDA

By Terri Penfold

Share:

Sep 14, 2017


On 12th September 2017, the Biologics License Application (BLA) submitted by Sandoz (Novartis) for Rixathon (GP2013; rituximab biosimilar) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was accepted.

The BLA was supported by data from the phase III confirmatory ASSIST-FL study (NCT01419665), which aimed to compare the efficacy and safety, as well as the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD), of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone combined with either Rixathon (GP2013-CVP) or rituximab (R-CVP) in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced stage FL (n=629).

Key Highlights:

  • Treatment phase = 6 months; maintenance phase = 2 years; follow-up = 3 years
  • Pts randomly assigned to 8 cycles of CP2013-CVP (n=314) or R-CVP (n=315)
  • Pts who achieved CR or PR entered the double-blind maintenance phase, and received either CP2013 or rituximab
  • ORR with GP2013-CVP was 87.1% (CR = 14.8%; PR = 72.3%) versus 5% (CR = 13.4%; PR = 74.1%) with R-CVP
  • Median PFS and OS have not been reached
  • PK and PD of Rixathon was similar to rituximab
  • Incidence of SAEs was similar in GP2013-CVP and R-CVP arms (22.8% vs 0%, respectively)
  • Most frequent SAE in GP2013-CVP and R-CVP arms was febrile neutropenia (4.8% vs 9%, respectively)
  • As of 10th July 2015, 35 deaths have been recorded (GP2013-CVP n=18; R-CVP n=17)
  • Most common cause of death in CP2013-CVP and R-CVP arms was Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (2.6% vs 9%, respectively)
  • Antidrug antibodies developed in 1.9% (n=5) of GP2013-CVP pts and 1.1% (n=3) R-CVP pts

If approved, the indications for Rixathon will include Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBLC), and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) gave a positive opinion for Rixathon in April 2017 (read more here), and this was followed by European approval in June. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?