All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Challenges in defining a new standard of care in Primary CNS Lymphoma

Nov 17, 2016


In May 2016, Glass et al. published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology the results of a phase I/II study into the efficacy of methotrexate, temozolomide (TMZ) with rituximab, proceeded by hyperfractionated Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (hWBRT) in patients with Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL), followed by maintenance treatment with TMZ. The reported 2-year OS and PFS were 80.8% and 63.6%, respectively.

In a more recent correspondence, also in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Marc C. Chamberlain, of the University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, responded to these results explaining potential issues with the study. The key points of concern were:

  • Due to timing of assessments, it was unclear if rituximab, dosed at 5 intervals alongside HD-MTX, provided an additional benefit
  • TMZ has limited data as a single-agent treatment in this setting
  • TMZ dose was lower than other studies, potentially leading to undertreatment with TMZ
  • Use of dose-reduced hWBRT to reduce late neurotoxicity, however no significant evidence of late neurotoxicity was reported since the measure of cognitive dysfunction used was poor
  • Myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy and ASCT are more frequently being suggested as alternatives to consolidation WBRT
  • Value of 10 cycles of TMZ maintenance therapy, following hWBRT, was not shown


In conclusion, both the authors of the original study and Marc Chamberlain state that randomized trials are needed to elucidate the value of these protocol modifications for treatment of PCNSL. Marc Chamberlain also suggested that deciding upon which regimen a patient should follow is based on “interpretation of a confusing literature”, and the physician’s familiarity with and subjective opinions of therapies, amplifying the need for more randomized, multi-arm studies.

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?