All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CLL-IPI applied and validated in an unselected prospective study

Nov 16, 2016


Caspar da Cunha-Bang, from Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, and colleagues wrote a letter to the editor of Blood recently, presenting a prospective study of data from the Danish National CLL Registry using the CLL-IPI to estimate TTE and OS in a population of newly diagnosed CLL patients. The CLL-IPI prognostic model was developed to replace the Rai-Binet clinical staging system for CLL patients using newer diagnostic techniques and has previously been discussed on the Lymphoma Hub.

The CLL-IPI requires 5 parameters which are: clinical stage, age, IGHV mutational status, TP53 status, and β2-microglobulin level. The CLL-IPI was created and validated before the current era of chemoimmunotherapy; therefore, the authors of this letter stated that it was important to validate the CLL-IPI in a population-based cohort of newly diagnosed CLL patients undergoing more modern therapies.

Highlights:

  • 1,514 newly diagnosed CLL patients between 2008 and 2015 in Denmark had data on the 5 CLL-IPI variables and were included
  • Low risk = 861 pts. 3-year OS = 91%
  • Intermediate risk = 453 pts. 3-year OS = 86%
  • High risk = 193 pts. 3-year OS = 76%
  • Very high risk = 34 pts. 3-year OS = 62%
  • CLL-IPI predicted significantly different OS and TTE for all of the risk groups (P <0.001)

The authors concluded their letter by stating that, in an unselected population based cohort of newly diagnosed CLL patients, the CLL-IPI index was confirmed to be robust. Furthermore, they encouraged centers to include the five CLL-IPI diagnostic parameters into routine diagnostics in CLL patients in the future.

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?