All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi, and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CRISTALLO phase III primary analysis: VenO vs FCR/BR in previously untreated CLL

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Apr 3, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.


Results from the primary analysis of the randomized, open-label, international phase III CRISTALLO study (NCT04285567), comparing first-line fixed-duration venetoclax + obinutuzumab (VenO; n = 80) vs fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab / bendamustine + rituximab (FCR/BR; n = 86) in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) without del(17p)/TP53 mutations, were published in Blood by Sharman et al. The primary endpoint was rate of undetectable measurable residual disease (<10−4; uMRD) at Month 15. Key secondary endpoints included uMRD in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) at the end of treatment (EoT) and investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

Key data: The primary endpoint was met; at Month 15, 81.3% vs 54.7% of patients in the VenO vs FCR/BR arms demonstrated uMRD in PB (p = 0.0004). At the EoT, uMRD rates were higher in the VenO vs FCR/BR arm in both PB (81.3% vs 60.5%; p = 0.0053) and BM (70.0% vs 38.4%; p < 0.0001). At data cutoff, median PFS was not reached due to the short survival follow-up. The 2‑year PFS rates were 95.7% vs 90.4% in VenO vs FCR/BR. The complete response (CR) / CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate was higher with VenO vs FCR/BR (50.0% vs 32.6%). The overall response rates (ORRs) were 88.8% in VenO vs 79.1% in FCR/BR (p = 0.1119). In the safety evaluable population, Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 83.1% of patients receiving VenO vs 81.2% of patients receiving FCR/BR.

Key learning: Results indicate that fixed-duration VenO demonstrated significantly greater improvements in MRD responses vs FCR/BR in fit, previously untreated patients with CLL. Longer follow-up is warranted to establish PFS outcomes.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In your experience, what is the average vein-to-vein time when treating patients with DLBCL with a reimbursed CAR T-cell therapy (from apheresis to infusion)?