TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Daratumumab in R/R MCL, DLBCL and FL: Results of a phase II trial

By Sylvia Agathou

Share:

Mar 4, 2019


Professor Gilles Salles from Lyon University, Lyon, FR and colleagues, recently published in the Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia the results of a phase II trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab monotherapy in relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients.

Daratumumab is a CD38 monoclonal antibody, which has been approved for the treatment of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma and has shown promising activity in pre-clinical NHL models. The aim of this global, proof-of-concept, phase II trial (NCT02413489) was to investigate whether single-agent daratumumab is efficient and safe for R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. The primary endpoint of the trial was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints, included safety and pharmacokinetics.

Study design & baseline characteristics

  • N = 36 R/R NHL patients:
    • DLBCL: n = 15 patients
    • FL: n = 16 patients
    • MCL: n = 5 patients
  • Median patient age (range): 64 (43–82) years
  • Median time since diagnosis: 37.9 months
  • Median number of prior treatment lines across all patients (range): 3 (2–10)
  • All FL patients were previously-treated with rituximab and all MCL patients with ibrutinib
  • Overall median CD38 expression across enrolled patients: 70%
    • DLBCL: 80%
    • FL: 67.5%
    • MCL: 60%
  • Dosing:
    • Daratumumab (28-day cycles): 16 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) infusion once every week for eight weeks; then, every other week for 16 weeks; thereafter, every four weeks until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or study end
    • Pre-infusion medications:
      • Methylprednisolone: 100 mg IV, one hour prior to daratumumab for the first two infusions and 60 mg IV thereafter
        • Oral methylprednisolone of 20 mg was administered two days after the first three daratumumab infusions
      • Acetaminophen: 650–1000 mg one hour prior to daratumumab
      • Diphenhydramine: 25–50 mg IV one hour prior to daratumumab
    • Median number of daratumumab infusions (range):
      • DLBCL: 5 (2–24)
      • FL: 9 (2–30)
      • MCL: 5 (2–8)
    • Median number of daratumumab treatment cycles (range):
      • DLBCL: 2 (1–14)
      • FL: 3 (1–20)
      • MCL: 2 (1–2)
    • Median duration of daratumumab treatment (range):
      • DLBCL: 35 (8–366) days
      • FL: 70 (8–530) days
      • MCL: 36 (8–50) days 

Key results

  • ORR per NHL patient cohort:
    • DLBCL: 6.7% (95% CI, 0.2–31.9)
    • FL: 12.5% (95% CI, 1.6–38.3)
    • MCL: no patients responded to treatment
  • Among responders:
    • Time to response was:
      • DLBCL: 1.9 months (n = 1 responder)
      • FL: 2.3 months and 1.9 months (n = 2 responders)
    • Duration of response was:
      • DLBCL: 1.6 months
      • FL: 0.7 months and 7.4 months
    • Most DLBCL patients (73.3%) and MCL patients (80.0%) had PD
    • Most FL patients (62.5%) had stable disease (SD)
    • Clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + SD) was:
      • DLBCL: 13.3% (95% CI, 1.7–40.5)
      • FL: 75.0% (95% CI, 47.6–92.7)
      • MCL: 0%
    • Median progression-free survival (PFS) after a median follow-up (FU), was:
      • DLBCL (FU, 14.7 months): 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.6–1.7)
      • FL (FU, 11.5 months): 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.8)
      • MCL (FU, 15.4 months): 1.3 months (95% CI, 0.5–1.9)
    • Median overall survival (OS) after a median follow-up (FU), was:
      • DLBCL (FU, 14.7 months): 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.1–9.0)
      • FL (FU, 11.5 months): 17.2 months (95% CI, 15.0–not estimable)
      • MCL (FU, 15.4 months): 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.7–not estimable)

Safety

  • All patients developed at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)
  • The most common TEAEs were:
    • Cough
    • Abdominal pain
    • Nausea
    • Fatigue
    • Pyrexia
  • Grade 3−4 TEAEs occurred in:
    • DLBCL: 46.7% of patients
    • FL: 62.5% of patients
    • MCL: 60.0% of patients
  • The most frequently reported Grade 3−4 TEAEs were:
    • Thrombocytopenia
    • Neutropenia
    • Hypertension
  • Nine patients had Grade 3−4 TEAEs that were associated with daratumumab treatment
  • Serious TEAEs occurred:
    • DLBCL: 40.0% of patients
    • FL: 37.5% of patients
    • MCL: 60.0% of patients
  • Infusion-related reactions occurred in 72.2% of patients across all cohorts, with the most common one being cough:
    • DLBCL: 26.7%
    • FL: 25.0%
    • MCL: 80.0%
  • Treatment discontinuation occurred in four patients due to TEAEs

Conclusions

  • The response rates to daratumumab monotherapy were very low and its activity not promising in R/R MCL, FL and DLBCL patients 
  • An unmet need for effective therapies against R/R NHL still exists

References