All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Educational theme | Treatment of elderly patients with follicular lymphoma

By Alice Hyde

Share:

Jun 4, 2021


Our educational theme on the Lymphoma Hub this quarter has aimed to explore the management of elderly patients with lymphoma. The previous article in this series investigated the recent advances in prognostic assessment and treatment of elderly patients, and can be found here.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a form of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is more common in older patients; however, due to the increased likelihood of comorbidities, these patients are less frequently included in chemotherapy trials. More data is required to understand the impact of age on treatment efficacy and disease progression. There has been some indication that older age is not associated with higher-risk disease in FL, therefore, investigation of a large cohort of patients is necessary.

Carla Casulo and colleagues described the results of older patients with FL across 18 randomized controlled trials, in an article recently published in Blood Advances.1

Study design

The Follicular Lymphoma Analysis of Surrogacy Hypothesis (FLASH) group carried out pooled analysis of individual patient data from first-line randomized controlled chemotherapy trials to investigate the association between age, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. A total of 18 trials were included with 5,922 patients enrolled. A subgroup of 3,450 patients who were treated with rituximab were also analyzed.

Patients with untreated FL were eligible if enrolled in 1 out of 21 studies included in the FLASH database. Studies with all patients ≤70 years were excluded.

The primary endpoints of the study were:

  • Complete response (CR) at 24 and 30 months (CR24 and CR30, respectively)
  • Progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months

Secondary endpoints were:

  • PFS
  • Overall survival (OS)

Results

The majority of patients were ≤60 years old (63.0%); 27.9% were between 61−70 years, 8.8% were between 71−80 years, and only 0.3% were >80 years. Elevated hemoglobin and β-2 levels were more common in patients >70 years (both p<0.0001). Over 90% of patients included had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 0−1 (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*

ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; FLIPI, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; Hb, hemoglobin; ULN, upper limit of normal.
*Adapted from Casulo et al.1

Characteristic

Age ≤70 y
n = 5,380

Age >70 y
n = 542

Total

N = 5,922

p value

Age, years

Mean (SD)

53.7 (10.10)

74.0 (3.00)

55.6 (11.29)

< 0.0001

Median (range)

55.0 (17.8, 70.0)

73.2 (70.0, 90.1)

56.3 (17.8, 90.1)

Sex (%)

Female

49.5

55.9

50.1

0.0042

ECOG-PS

0−1, %

95.0

91.2

94.6

0.0004

≥2, %

5.0

8.8

5.4

Missing, n

854

55

909

FLIPI (%)

Low, %

21.8

2.6

20.0

< 0.0001

Intermediate, %

38.7

26.7

37.5

High, %

39.5

70.8

42.4

Missing, n

846

77

923

Nodal sites

<5, %

35.0

45.6

36.0

< 0.0001

≥5, %

65.0

54.4

64.0

Missing, n

1,818

167

1,985

Hb at baseline

≥12 g/dL, %

81.4

72.8

80.6

< 0.0001

<12 g/dL, %

18.6

27.2

19.4

Missing, n

1,315

130

1,445

β-2 at baseline

> ULN, %

48.5

67.8

50.2

< 0.0001

≤ ULN, %

51.5

32.2

49.8

Missing, n

3,468

365

3,833

CR24 and CR30 rates were similar between the two age groups (Table 2). With a median follow-up of 5.1 and 5.6 years, the OS of patients was significantly decreased in the >70 group compared with patients ≤70 years (p < 0.001). OS remained significantly reduced in the group of patients >70 years old (p < 0.001) following analysis that considered death after progression as the event of interest, with death without progression as a competing risk.

PFS was reduced in patients >70 years old compared with those ≤70 years (p < 0.001), however when considering death without disease progression as a competing risk, the difference between ages groups was no longer significant (p = 0.965). Therefore, while patients >70 were more likely to die than the younger group, this was not a result of disease progression.

Table 2. Survival outcomes*

PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; CR, complete response.
*Adapted from Casulo et al.1

Outcome

≤70 years

>70 years

CR24, %

32.3

29.6

CR30, %

34.3

31.8

PFS, years

3.8

3.1

OS, years

15.7

7.4

In the rituximab treated subgroup (n = 4,564) the CR24 (38.5% vs 39.9%, >70 and ≤70 years, respectively) and CR30 (41.6% vs 43.2%%, >70 and ≤70 years, respectively) results were comparable between age groups.

Conclusion

PFS was shown to be similar between adult and elderly (>70 years) patients with FL in this analysis, indicating that age should not automatically disqualify patients from standard treatment or clinical trials. It should be noted that while this data is promising, only 9.2% of patients in this study were >70 years old. A prospective study in patients >70 years old with FL is needed to confirm these findings.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?