All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Featured:
On 14 June 2019, at the 24th European Hematology Association Congress, Tanya Siddiqi presented results of the ongoing phase I/II TRANSCEND CLL 004 study. The study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, JCAR017). Liso-cel is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product administered as a defined composition of CD4+/CD8+ CAR T-cells.
The primary objectives of the study were safety and determination of the recommended phase II dose.
Baseline characteristics |
All patients (n = 23) |
DL1 (n = 9) |
DL2 (n = 14) |
---|---|---|---|
Received bridging therapy |
17 (73.9%) |
5 (55.6%) |
12 (85.7%) |
High-risk features |
19 (82.6%) |
6 (66.7%) |
13 (92.9%) |
Del (17p) |
8 (34.8%) |
3 (33.3%) |
5 (35.7%) |
Tp53 mutation |
14 (60.9%) |
4 (44.4%) |
10 (71.4%) |
Complex karyotypeb |
11 (47.8%) |
5 (55.6%) |
6 (42.9%) |
Previous therapy |
5 (2 – 11) |
5 (3 – 8) |
5 (2 – 11) |
Prior ibrutinib |
23 (100%) |
9 (100%) |
14 (100%) |
Ibrutinib relapsed/refractory |
21 (91.3%) |
9 (100%) |
12 (85.7%) |
Ibrutinib progression and prior venetoclax |
13 (56.5%) |
5 (55.6%) |
8 (57.1%) |
Dr Siddiqi mentioned how toxicities related to liso-cell were manageable, with promising clinical activity in patients who had been heavily pre-treated with ibrutinib and venetoclax. At both dose levels, adverse events were manageable, with a follow-up of 9 months showing a high proportion of durable responses that improved over time. The majority of responses and undetected MRD were achieved by day 30, with a large proportion of patients remaining in CR at 6 months, remaining in CR.
A phase II study is currently enrolling patients at dose level 2, stemming from the results of this phase I trial. Patients in this trial will be treated with liso-cel in combination with ibrutinib.
References
Your opinion matters
Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?