All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Caribou Biosciences, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through independent educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EHA 2026 | What are the most recent findings from the phase I NX-5948-301 trial evaluating bexobrutideg in CLL?

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Featured:

Talha MunirTalha Munir

Jun 16, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.


Do you know... What was the most common TEAE observed in patients receiving bexobrutideg for the treatment of R/R CLL in the NX-5948-301 trial?

During the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE, the Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak with Dr Talha Munir, Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK. We asked, What are the most recent findings from the phase I NX-5948-301 trial evaluating bexobrutideg in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)? 

EHA 2026 | What are the most recent findings from the phase I NX-5948-301 trial evaluating bexobrutideg in CLL?

Key points1 

  • Bexobrutideg is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degrader that shows superior cell killing across common BTK mutations in CRISPR-engineered TMD8 cells compared with other BTK inhibitors (BTKis) and demonstrates selective degradation of BTK at clinically relevant exposures. 
  • The ongoing phase Ia/b NX-5948-301 study (NCT05131022) is investigating bexobrutideg in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies, including CLL and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (N = 142). 
  • Phase Ia is a dose-escalation study that evaluated the safety and tolerability of bexobrutideg at doses 50–600 mg in R/R CLL/SLL. 
  • In the phase Ib portion of the trial, patients with prior BTKi and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (BCL2i) exposure were randomized to receive 600 mg or 200 mg bexobrutideg.  
  • In the phase Ib dose-expansion portion of the study, bexobrutideg is being evaluated in up to 17 expansion cohorts, including in patients treated at earlier lines of therapy, at the recommended phase II dose (600 mg). 
  • Cohort 5 (C5) includes patients who have been exposed to BTKis but are BCL2i-naïve, and Cohort 15 (C15) includes patients who are BTKi-naïve or treatment-naïve. 
  • At 22.4 months follow-up, in the phase Ia portion of the trial (n = 48), the objective response rate (ORR) was 83.0%, with a complete response in 4% of patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.1 months. 
  • In phase Ib, the ORRs in cohorts C5 and C15 were as follows: 
    • Cohort C5: At 5.2 months follow-up, the ORR was 92.9% (n = 19). 
    • Cohort C15: At 4.9 months follow-up, the ORR was 84.2% (n = 20). 
  • Lymph node size decreases were observed regardless of prior treatments or mutational burden at baseline. 
  • Overall (N = 142), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 94.4% of patients; 77.5% were treatment-related. 
  • Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 51.4% of patients, with 24.6% being treatment-related, and Grade 5 TEAEs occurred in 3% of patients.  
  • No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any dose level. 
  • The most common TEAE was purpura/contusion, followed by neutropenia, petechiae, and diarrhea. 
  • These data support the further clinical development of bexobrutideg; the phase II DAYBreak-201 study (NCT07221500) is ongoing, with the phase III DAYBreak-306 study due to initiate in 2026.  

This educational resource is independently supported by Nurix. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What is the primary reason you use bridging therapy in patients with DLBCL awaiting CAR T-cell therapy?