All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.

2022-08-25T10:46:21.000Z

Emerging novel therapies for the treatment of patients with aggressive R/R NHL

Aug 25, 2022
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall safety and efficacy data from a phase I study of a novel treatment for R/R DLBCL.

Bookmark this article

Introduction

Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), responses are not robust in all patients and many experience disease progression following treatment; therefore, there is an urgent need for novel therapies in this population.1 CAR T-cell products and small molecule agents are being evaluated in clinical trials aimed at improving upon the clinical efficacy and safety of currently available products.

Results from the following three novel therapeutic trials were presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2022 Congress: a phase I study of YTB323, a next-generation CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)1; a phase I/II study of anbalcabtagene autoleucel (anbal-cel), a novel anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy with dual silencing of PD-1 and TIGIT in R/R large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL)2; and a phase I study evaluating the clinical activity of CC-99282, an E3 ligase modulator (CELMOD) agent, in patients with R/R NHL.3 Below, we highlight the key findings from each study.

Phase I study of YTB323, a next-generation CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with R/R DLBCL

YTB323 is manufactured through an innovative process involving cell expansion, primarily within the body of the patient. This method reduces the CAR T-cell manufacturing time and preserves both the naïve and stem cell memory T cells to reduce T-cell exhaustion, increasing functionality and persistence. It is anticipated that this will lead to increased efficacy and more durable responses in patients.

Study design

Patients aged ≥18 years with measurable disease at study entry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0–1, and R/R DLBCL ≥2 prior lines of therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were included in this study. Figure 1 shows the treatment regimen for patients infused with YTB323.

The primary endpoints were incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events to determine a recommended dose. The secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival, and cellular kinetics.

Figure 1. Treatment regimen for patients with R/R DLBCL infused with YTB323* 

CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CY, cyclophosphamide; DL, dosing level; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FLU, fludarabine; R/R, relapsed/refractory.
*Data from Dickinson.1

Results

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics for patients infused with YTB323 (N = 45) are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with YTB323*

Variable, % (unless otherwise stated)

YTB323 infused (N = 45)

Median age (range), years

64.8 (41–79)

Race

 

               Asian

2.2

               White

93.3

Histology

 

               DLBCL

95.6

               Transformed lymphoma/other

4.4

Elevated LDG (>ULN)

55.6

Prior HSCT

28.9

Prior lines of therapy

 

               2

66.7

               >3

33.3

Time since most recent relapse/progression to YTB323, median (range), months

2.8 (1.4–81.8)

Received bridging therapy

66.7

DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; LDG, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; ULN, upper limit of normal.
*Adapted from Dickinson.1

Safety

Almost all patients experienced at least one AE of any grade. At dose level (DL) 2, the selected dose, DLTs occurred in two patients (7%), one with Grade 4 cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and the other with Grade 4 cytopenia (Table 2). There were no further DLTs, despite six patients receiving higher doses, and no deaths were reported.

The overall incidence of CRS was low, with 36% (10/28) of patients experiencing Grade 1/2 events and one patient experiencing a Grade 3/4 event. For the management of CRS, tocilizumab was given to seven patients, corticosteroids to three patients, and vasopressor to one patient at DL2. CRS had a delayed onset of 10 days and lasted for a median of 4 days at the selected dose. At DL2, immune cell-associated neurologic syndrome occurred in three patients (10.7%) at 10, 16, and 28 days; two patients had Grade 3/4 and one patient had Grade 1/2. For the management of immune cell-associated neurologic syndrome, two patients received dexamethasone and anakinra and one patient received methylprednisolone.

Table 2. Adverse events in patients with R/R DLBCL treated with YTB323*

Adverse events, % (unless
otherwise stated)

YTB323
2.5 × 106
(n = 4)

YTB323
12.5 × 106
(n = 28)

YTB323
25 × 106
(n = 7)

YTB323
40 × 106
(n = 6)

Any AE

 

 

 

 

               Any grade

100

96

86

100

               Grade >3

100

86

86

100

Dose-limiting toxicities

0

7

0

0

Deaths

50

14

0

33

Related to YTB323

0

0

0

0

Infections

 

 

 

 

               Any grade

50

21

29

50

               Grade> 3

25

14

0

33

CRS

25

36

29

33

               Grade 1/2

25

32

29

33

               Grade 3/4

0

4

0

0

               Time to onset, days

9

10 (1–17)

7.36

2.9

               Time from onset to                resolution, days

5

4 (1–18)

5.10

5.7

ICANS

0

10.7

0

33.3

               Grade 1/2

0

3.6

0

33.3

               Grade 3/4

0

7.1

0

33.3

               Time to onset, days

10, 16, 28

6, 28

               Time from onset to                resolution, days

11, 16, 24

1, 36

AE, adverse event; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.
*Adapted from Dickinson.1
ICANS occurred in three patients at 10, 16, and 28 days.


Efficacy and cellular kinetics

Across all dose groups, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 69% and 62%, respectively, at Day 28. At DL2, the ORR and CR were 69% and 65%, respectively. Responses were durable with CR maintained at 63% and 69% after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Median DOR was not reached. YTB323 expansion at DL2 was comparable to the higher end of tisagenlecleucel expansion, at a 25-fold lower dose.

Figure 2. Response rates in patients with R/R DLBCL who were treated with YTB323* 

CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate.

*Data from Dickinson.1

Phase I/II study of anbal-cel, a novel anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy with dual silencing of PD-1 and TIGIT, in R/R LBCL

One potential reason for the failure of CAR T-cell therapy is the reduction of CAR+ T-cells due to the high expression of immune checkpoint proteins, such as TIGIT and PD-1. Anbal-cel is designed to downregulate the expression of both PD-1 and TIGIT in order to sustain the efficacy and durability of CAR T-cells.

Study design

Key eligibility criteria:

  • Either DLBCL-not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0–1
  • R/R after ≥2 lines of prior therapies
  • Appropriate organ functions
  • No prior CD19 targeted therapy

The treatment regimen can be seen in Figure 3.

The primary endpoints were safety related and included DLTs and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary endpoints included ORR, DOR, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Figure 3. Treatment regimen for patients infused with anbal-cel* 

Anbal-cel, anbalcabtagene autoleucel; CY, cyclophosphamide; DL, dosing level; FLU, fludarabine.
*Adapted from Kim.2

Results

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics for the 11 patients treated in this study are highlighted in Table 3.

Table 3. Baseline characteristics for patients infused with anbal-cel*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

All patients (N = 11)

Median age (range), years

46 (26–71)

               ≥65

4 (36)

Male

55

ECOG Performance Status 1

36

Disease subtype

 

               DLBCL

91

               tFL

9

Cell of origin of cancer

 

               GCB

55

               Non-GCB

45

Double expressor type

45

Previous line of therapy

 

               1/2

36

               3

27

               ≥4

36

Refractory to last line of therapy

73

Previous ASCT

36

Refractory to 1st line of therapy

55

median SPD (range), mm2

3,520 (570–7,719)

               ≥5,000 mm2

45

anbal-cel, anbalcabtagene autoleucel; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GCB, germinal center B-cell; SPD, sum of the product of diameters; tFL, transformed follicular lymphoma.
*Adapted from Kim.2

Safety and efficacy

Of the 11 evaluable patients, five (46%) experienced CRS; two patients with Grade 1, one patient with Grade 2, and two patients with Grade 3. Most of the treatment-emergent adverse events were observed at the higher dose, DL3. The most common adverse events across all doses were CRS (46%), anemia (18%), neutropenia (18%), fever (18%), and thrombocytopenia (18%; Table 4). The onset of CRS was delayed, occurring at 7 days, and had a median duration of 5 days. Only one patient experienced a Grade 2 neurological event at DL3, this patient also had CRS and was therefore treated with both tocilizumab and steroids.

Tmax were 15.4, 15.8, and 11 days at DL1, DL2, and DL3, respectively, which is slightly delayed when compared to other CAR T-cell therapies. There was a dose-dependent drug expansion observed where area under the curve (AUC) and Cmax proportionally increased with dose of anbal-cel. AUC at Day 0–28 was 679,125, 1,110,108, and 2,852,235 copies/ug gDNA at DL1, DL2, and DL3, respectively. Median Cmax was 18,003, 30,103, and 53,688 copies/ug gDNA at DL1, DL2, and DL3.

All patients who responded to treatment achieved a CR across all dose levels, with an overall ORR and CR of 82%. Both ORR and CR were 75%, 67%, and 100% at DL1, DL2, and DL3, respectively. For CR patients at DL1 and DL2, these responses were durable.

Table 4. TRAE’s for patients treated with anbal-cel*

TRAE any grade, %
(unless otherwise stated)

× 105 cells/kg
(n = 4)

× 105 cells/kg
(n = 3)

× 106 cells/kg
(n = 4)

Total
(N = 11)

CRS

 

 

 

 

               Incidence

0

100

50

46

               Median onset
               (range), day

n/a

7 (6–11)

8.5 (1–16)

7 (1–16)

               Median duration
               (range), days

n/a

2 (1–5)

16.5 (14–19)

5 (1–19)

Anemia

0

0

50

18

Neutropenia

0

0

50

18

Fever

25

0

25

18

Thrombocytopenia

0

0

50

18

DIC

0

0

25

9

Herpes

0

33

0

9

Hypogammaglobulinemia

0

0

25

9

ICANS

0

0

25

9

Rash

0

0

25

9

Sepsis

0

0

25

9

Neurological events

 

 

 

 

               Incidence

0

0

25

9

               Median onset,
               days

n/a

n/a

7

7

               Median duration,
               days

n/a

n/a

13

13

anbal cel, anbalcabtagene autoleucel; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; ICANS, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; n/a, not applicable; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.
*Adapted from Kim.2

Figure 4. Response rates in patients infused with anbal-cel* 

anbal-cel, anbalcabtagene autoleucel; CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate.
*Data from Kim.2

Phase I, open-label study evaluating the clinical activity of CC-99282, a cereblon E3 ligase modulator agent, in patients with R/R NHL

CC-99282, a small cereblon E3 ligase modulator agent, targets the degradation of two transcription factors, Ikaros and Aiolos, which are important for B-cell development and differentiation. CC-99282 has shown antiproliferative and apoptotic activity in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) cell lines and this first-in-human study explores its safety and efficacy in a clinical setting.

Study design

This is a multicenter, open-label study consisting of two parts: a dose escalation of CC-99282 monotherapy and a dose expansion with and without combination partners. This report focuses on the dose escalation results. Eligible patients were those with R/R DLBCL or follicular lymphoma who progressed after two or more lines of therapy, and patients with R/R DLBCL who received one or more line of therapy and were also unfit for chemotherapy or transplant. Patients received CC99282 at an oral dose of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, or 0.8 mg once daily in three intermittent dosing schedules of 28-day cycles: a 5/7 days schedule (5 days on/2 days off), a 7/14 days schedule (7 days on/7 days off), and a 14/28 days schedule (14 days on/14 days off).

The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability to determine MTD and the recommended phase 2 dose. The secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics for patients are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5. Baseline characteristics for patients treated with CC-99282*

Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated)

All patients (N = 50)

Median age (range), years 

65.5 (35–89)

Male

58

Diagnosis

 

               DLBCL

76

               NOS

44

               Double- or triple-hit positive

14

               Transformed

32

               FL (Grade 1–3B)

24

Median time from initial diagnosis to first dose
(range), months

 

 

               DLBCL

22.5 (4.5–94.5)

               FL

71.8 (22.5–135.9)

ECOG Performance Status

 

               0

42

               1

50

               2

8

Stage IV cancer at diagnosis

58

Treatment history

 

               Median prior lines of therapy (range), n

3 (1–8)

               Prior stem cell transplant

20

               Prior CAR T-cell therapy

28

               Prior lenalidomide/avadomide
               treatment

22

               Refractory to last regimen

50

CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FL, follicular lymphoma; NOS, not otherwise specified.
*Adapted from Michot.3

Safety and efficacy

A total of 32 patients reported a Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event. The most common were neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anemia (8%; Figure 5). No patients discontinued treatment because of neutropenia. The high incidence of severe neutropenia was found to be strongly related with the number of prior lines of alkylating agent and not related to CC-99282. Neutropenia was managed with dose modifications of CC-99282 and granulocyte colony stimulating factors. All DLTs were hematologic, mostly caused by neutropenia, and MTDs of interest were 0.6 mg and 0.4 mg during the 7/14-day schedule and the 14/28-day schedule, respectively. Eight patients (16%) reported serious adverse events related to CC-99282, including 4 patients (8%) with febrile neutropenia.

ORR was 42% at the dose of interest (0.4 mg), CR and partial response was achieved in 17% and 25%, respectively. Durable responses were observed at the dose of interest and above in patients with initial partial response converting to a CR. Median DOR was 239 days and median follow-up was 247 days at the 7/14 days schedule. For the 14/28 days schedule, the median DOR and median follow-up were 112 days and 121 days, respectively.

In terms of pharmacokinetics, there was dose-dependent activity of CC-99282, with an increase in plasma CC-99282 and degradation of transcription factors Ikaros/Aiolos in peripheral T cells, as the dosage increased. A shift of peripheral CD8+ cells to an activated phenotype, and a shift of CD8+ naïve cells to a memory T-cell phenotype was observed within 2 weeks of initiating CC-99282, which supports the immune-stimulation of the study drug. A reduction in ctDNA after treatment with CC-99282 was also observed, which could suggest strong tumor cell-intrinsic activity.

Figure 5. TEAEs related to CC-99282* 

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse events.
*Data from Michot.3

Conclusion

These results demonstrate the promising efficacy of emerging novel CAR T-cell therapies and small molecule agents in patients with aggressive NHL. YTB323, a CAR T-cell therapy with a next-generation manufacturing method, anbal-cel, a novel anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy with dual silencing of PD-1 and TIGIT, and CC-99282, a cereblon E3 ligase modulator agent, all produced a favorable safety profile and therefore could offer new treatment options for patients with R/R B-cell NHL.

  1. Dickinson M. Phase I study of YTB323, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy manufactured using T-chargeTM, in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Presentation #212. European Hematology Association 2022 Congress; Jun 11, 2022; Vienna, AT.
  2. Kim W. Phase 1/2 study of anbalcabtagene autoleucel novel anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy with dual silencing of PD-1 and TIGIT in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Presentation #214. European Hematology Association 2022 Congress; Jun 11, 2022; Vienna, AT.
  3. Michot JM. Clinical activity of CC-99282, a cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMOD) agent, in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL) – results from a phase 1, open-label study. Presentation #216. European Hematology Association 2022 Congress; Jun 12, 2022; Vienna, AT.

More about...

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the Lymphoma Hub?
55 votes - 68 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox