The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
The Lymphoma Hub was pleased to speak with Francesc Bosch, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, ES. We asked, How do you choose among different BTK inhibitors for treating CLL?
How do you choose among different BTK inhibitors for treating CLL?
Bosch opens by outlining common BTK inhibitors such as ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib, noting that comparable efficacy and activity rates can cause difficulty when determining the most appropriate treatment; however, safety profiles vary. Bosch goes on to suggest that other factors, such as patient comorbidities, may be more useful; for example, the varying cardiovascular toxicity of BTK inhibitors may be pertinent when treating patients with comorbid cardiovascular conditions.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content