All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ibrutinib did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint in patients with R/R FL in the phase II DAWN study

By Sara Valente

Share:

Sep 5, 2018


On 31st May 2018, results from the phase II DAWN study were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Ajay K. Gopal, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, and colleagues. The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL).

Study Overview

  • N = 110 patients with R/R FL were included in the study. 67% of patients were male and the median age was 61.5 years (range, 28–87). Patients had a median of 3 prior lines of therapy
  • Patients were treated with ibrutinib 560 mg daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
  • The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC)
  • Secondary endpoints included; duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS)

Key Findings

  • Median follow-up was 27.7 months
  • ORR = 20.9% (95% CI, 13.7–29.7%)
    • N = 12 patients had a complete response (CR) 11% (95% CI, 5.8–18.3%)
    • The study, therefore, did not meet its primary objective, defined as an ORR with the lower bound threshold of >18%
  • Median DOR = 19.4 months
  • Median PFS = 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–5.5)
  • Median TTNT = 16 months (95% CI, 10.7–19.1)
  • 30-month OS = 61% (95% CI, 0.51–0.70%)
  • Most frequent adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 included; neutropenia (n = 15), anemia (n = 10) and fatigue (n = 6)
    • N = 8 deaths were reported during the study. 2 fatal AE cases were considered possibly related to ibrutinib (neutropenic sepsis and pneumonia)

The authors concluded that since the study did not meet its primary endpoint, ibrutinib monotherapy cannot be supported in patients with R/R FL.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?