All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Bookmark this article
On 5th July 2017, Dr Nam Dang, from the University of Florida Health, et al. published study results in a Letter to the Editor of the British Journal of Haematology for a randomized, phase III, open-label study of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab (R-InO) treatment for patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) (NCT01232556).1
The study compared the efficacy and safety of R-InO with either rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) or rituximab plus gemcitabine (R-G) in adults with R/R CD20+/CD22+ B-NHL who were not candidates for chemotherapy.
Patients were enrolled to the study (n=338) between February 2011 and May 2013 and randomized to receive R-InO (n=166) or investigator’s choice (IC) of either R-B (n=137) or R-G (n=35). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Objective Response Rate (ORR).
Two interim analyses (IA) were planned at 40% and 70% of OS events. Since the IA 40% estimated HR > 0.9 for OS in R-InO vs IC, the study was terminated on 16th May 2013.
The study did not show treatment superiority for R-InO compared with IC in terms of OS. The authors noted that there are limited treatment options for patients with R/R aggressive B-NHL who are not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy, therefore, the efficacy shown for R-InO means that it remains a viable treatment option.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox