All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
On 15th May 2017, during iwCLL, the second half of the “Additional Therapies for the Relapsed/Refractory CLL Patient” session was jointly chaired by Guillermo Dighiero (Unité d'Immunohématologie et d'Immmunopathologie, Institut Pasteur) and Federico Caligaris-Cappio (Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele).
During this session, Michael van Gelder from Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands, gave a presentation titled “Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-compatible donors in younger high cytogenetic risk CLL patients results in very high long-term Progression-Free Survival and Low Non-Relapse Mortality and may therefore favorably compete with the sequential use of kinase- and BCL2 inhibitors – a report From the CMWP of EBMT.”
Current preferred treatment option for R/R CLL include:
These achieve very high responses; however, relapses remain especially in high-risk CLL:
High-risk CLL patients generally respond to kinase and BCL2 inhibitors, either immediately or after failure on ≥1 kinase and/or BCL2 inhibitors. Short PFS has been reported after sequential use of kinase and/or BCL2 inhibitors.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (alloHCT) can result in very long PFS, independent of cytogenetics. But, Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) is a downside; it depends on age, performance, remission status at time of alloHCT, HLA match and donor-patient relation, sex-mismatch, etc.
EBMT registry data of transplanted CLL patients was analyzed and focused on younger (<50 years old) high-risk CLL patients and aimed to identify factors that predict low 2-year NRM and high 8-year PFS. It also aimed to study the impact of del(17p)/del(11q) on PFS. Median follow-up was 90.4 months.
Risk factor |
Numbers |
---|---|
Age (years) |
|
<45 years |
80 (41%) |
45–50 years |
117 (59%) |
Median |
46 years |
Prior Chemosensitivity |
|
Purine-analogue refractory |
67 (40%) |
Relapse after chemo-immunotherapy |
32 (19%) |
Cytogenetics |
|
Del(17p) |
23 (17%) |
Del(11q) and no del(17p) |
48 (35%) |
Median number of prior lines of therapy (range) |
3 (0–10) |
Previous autologous HCT |
24 (12%) |
Responsiveness at time of alloHCT |
114 (62%) |
Karnofsky (n=179) |
|
90–100 |
152 (84%) |
≤80 |
29 (16%) |
Risk factor |
Numbers |
---|---|
Conditioning (n=194) |
|
Non-myeloablative (2Gy TBI-based) |
58 (30%) |
Reduced intensity |
89 (46%) |
Myeloablative |
47 (24%) |
Donor type |
|
Matched related |
83 (42%) |
Match unrelated |
97 (49%) |
Partially mismatched unrelated |
17 (9%) |
Patient-donor sex match (n=193) |
|
Female donor for male patient |
39 (20%) |
CMV IgG in patient (n=180) |
|
Positive |
69 (38%) |
Risk factor |
HR (95% CI) |
p-value |
---|---|---|
Age (in decades) |
0.8 (0.4–1.6) |
0.55 |
Cytogenetics |
|
|
No del(17p) or del(11q) |
1 |
|
Del(17p) and/or del(11q) |
1.3 (0.6–2.9) |
0.51 |
Donor type |
|
|
HLA-identical sibling |
1 |
|
Matched unrelated |
2.5 (1.1–5.4) |
0.03 |
Partially matched unrelated |
4.0 (1.4–11.6) |
0.01 |
Sex match |
|
|
All other combination |
1 |
|
Female donor for male patient |
1.5 (0.7–3.3) |
0.27 |
Risk factor |
HR (95% CI) |
p-value |
---|---|---|
Donor type |
|
|
HLA-identical sibling |
1 |
|
Matched unrelated |
1.2 (0.8–1.8) |
0.41 |
Partially matched unrelated |
2.8 (1.5–5.2) |
<0.01 |
Sex match |
|
|
All other combination |
1 |
|
Female donor for male patient |
1.2 (0.7–1.9) |
0.50 |
Using the Cox models for 2- and 8-year PFS:
Good risk patients |
Poor risk patients |
---|---|
46 years old |
|
Del(17p) and/or del(11q) |
|
No prior autoHCT |
|
Remission at the time of alloHCT |
No remission at the time of alloHCT |
HLA-matched sibling |
|
No sex mismatch |
Unrelated female donor |
In conclusion, low-NRM risk factors can be identified (good transplant risk). Good transplant risk young CLL patients have a fairly good outcome: very low NRM and 8-year PFS of more than 50%.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox