The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
The phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085), previously reported on the Lymphoma Hub, is an open-label, multi-center study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the human anti-CD19 antibody tafasitamab-cxix in combination with lenalidomide in adult patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) who have received 1–3 prior systemic treatment regimens and are not eligible for high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation at the time of study commencement.
Five-year follow-up results of the trial show prolonged, durable responses in adult patients with R/R DLBCL treated with tafasitamab-cxix plus lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab-cxix monotherapy. These data were highlighted as a late-breaking oral presentation at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023.1
At data cut-off, 80 patients were evaluable for analysis.
No new safety signals were observed, with most adverse events (AEs) being Grade 1–2. Patients experienced a reduced frequency of any-grade and Grade ≥3 AEs during monotherapy. The most common AEs were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in patients who received combination therapy, and neutropenia and diarrhea in those who received monotherapy.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content