All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Long term follow-up ibrutinib and rituximab combination in patients with R/R MCL

By Sara Valente

Share:

Sep 12, 2018


On 22nd May 2018, a paper was published in The British Journal of Haematology on the four year follow up of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with ibrutinib and rituximab (IR). The paper was authored by Preetesh Jain, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and colleagues.

Study Overview

  • The study was a phase II open-label, single-center trial including 50 patients. The median age of patients was 68 years (range, 45–85). 76% were male

Key Findings

  • Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 1–52)
  • The objective response rate (ORR) was 88%
    • 58% achieved CR
  • Median event-free survival (EFS) was 16 months
  • Median duration of response (DOR) was 46 months
  • Median PFS was 43 months
  • Median OS was not reached
  • 76% of patients discontinued treatment
  • The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included; infection (n = 14), atrial fibrillation (n = 6) and pain (n = 6)
  • 18 patients died due to progressive disease (n = 14) and other causes (n = 4)

The authors concluded that in this four-year follow-up study, the combination of IR was “efficacious without long-term toxicities”.  In addition, IR caused durable remissions that could improve survival.

References

Your opinion matters

What is your preferred therapy class when planning treatment for a patient with R/R DLBCL after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy ?