The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a highly aggressive B-cell lymphoma that has a poor prognosis. The current standard of care involves high-dose cytarabine with rituximab, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation with rituximab maintenance. In the LyMA-101 phase II trial (NCT02896582), obinutuzumab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was combined with high-dose cytarabine for the treatment of transplant-eligible patients with MCL. The initial results were reported at the 24th European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress in 2019 and can be found on the Lymphoma Hub here.
The Lymphoma Hub is happy to provide a summary of the updated results, published by Steven Le Gouill and colleagues in Lancet Haematology.1
The primary endpoint of the LyMa-101 trial was measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow after four cycles of obinutuzumab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) at the end of induction. The study consisted of three sets of patients:
Median follow-up was 14.6 months (IQR, 10.3−17.2). The primary endpoint was successfully met and the MRD status at the end of induction is reported in Table 1. When this analysis was performed, the only patient who had progressed was MRD negative in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. The 12 patients who were MRD positive did not relapse during the duration of this study.
Table 1. Patient MRD status at the end of induction1
BM, bone marrow; MRD, measurable residual disease; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction. *12 BM-positive patients plus two patients who progressed prior to induction and four who were not assessed for MRD stats for reasons other than disease progression. |
|
|
Total, % (n = 73) |
BM assessed by qPCR |
92 |
BM MRD negative |
75 |
BM MRD positive |
16 |
Patient considered MRD positive* |
25 |
Following induction, 92% of patients in the safety set achieved an overall response (complete response [CR], CR unconfirmed, or partial response), including 61% who achieved a CR or CR unconfirmed.
Anemia (Grade 3, 27%; Grade 4, 4%; n = 85) and neutropenia (Grade 3, 15%; Grade 4, 38%; n = 85) were the most common adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was the main reason for discontinuation of obinutuzumab. In total, 16% of patients in the safety set stopped treatment. Three patients died, but this was not associated with obinutuzumab therapy.
The LyMa-101 trial met its primary outcome and demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of obinutuzumab with DHAP for the treatment of transplant-eligible patients with MCL. The authors concluded that DHAP plus obinutuzumab has potential as an induction regimen and that MRD negativity may be a helpful surrogate endpoint to predict long-term disease control.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content