All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

MYC/IG rearrangements are not responsible for poor survival in double-/triple-hit lymphoma

By Sylvia Agathou

Share:

Nov 9, 2018


In November 2018, Ellen McPhail from Mayo Clinic, MN, US, and colleagues, published in Haematologica a research study investigating the prognostic value of low-grade transformation, cytological characteristics (high-grade versus large-cell), cell of origin (CoO) and MYC rearrangements in the outcomes of double-/triple-hit lymphoma patients.

It is well-established that high-grade B-cell lymphoma with genetic rearrangements in MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 (double-/triple-hit [DH/TH]) presents with a very aggressive clinical phenotype and a varied cytological morphology. The possibility to use such cytological and genetic differences as prognostic markers of survival outcomes in DH/TH lymphoma patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to address this likelihood in DH/TH lymphoma patients, by investigating overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and EFS12, defined as event-free status at 12 months following diagnosis.

Study design

  • N = 100 DH/TH lymphoma patients who transformed from low-grade lymphoma and had received anthracycline-based chemotherapy at DH/TH diagnosis
  • Median age (range) at DH/TH diagnosis = 61 (29–87) years
  • DH/TH lymphoma was identified:
    • At initial diagnosis (n = 67)
    • At the time of transformation from low-grade lymphoma (n = 22)
    • From a recurrent specimen in previously-diagnosed lymphoma with large-cell or high-grade features without previous diagnosis (n = 11)
  • CoO was determined with Hans classifier and genetic rearrangements were examined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
  • Therapeutic regimens received by the participating patients were:
    • R-CHOP (n = 36)
    • Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (n =17)
    • R-CODOX-M/IVAC (n = 17)
    • R-hyper-CVAD and cytarabine (n =6)
    • Platinum-based salvage (n =10)
    • Non-anthracycline-based regimens (n = 14)
    • Twelve patients received consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)
  • Median follow-up (range): 21 (1–87) months

Results

  • In n = 65 cases consensus diagnosis was reached. Of those:
    • 60% had high-grade morphological features (n =39)
    • 40% had large-cell morphological features (n = 26)
  • Based on Hans classifier, the observed phenotypes were:
    • 91% germinal center B-cell (GCB; n =91)
    • 6% non-GCB
    • 3% unknown
  • The following MYC rearrangement partners were identified:
    • IG gene (n = 52)
    • Non-IG gene (n = 35)
    • Unknown (n = 13)
  • The following DH/TH rearrangements were detected:
    • MYC/BCL2 (n = 59)
    • MYC/BCL6 (n = 13)
    • MYC/BCL2/BCL6 (n = 20)
    • MYC/BCL2 (unknown BCL6; n = 8)
  • The MYC rearrangement partner (IG versus non-IG) was not associated with morphological features (P = 0.96), CoO (P = 0.18) or BCL2 rearrangements (P = 0.27)
  • However, MYC immunohistochemistry was more common in IG/MYC (95%) than non-IG/MYC (74%) samples (P = 0.049)
  • No significant association was observed between BCL2 rearrangements and morphological features (P = 0.16)
  • At the median follow-up of 21 months:
    • Median OS: 22 months (95% CI, 13 months–not reached)
  • At a 5-year follow-up:
    • OS rate: 49% (95% CI, 37–64%)
  • Patients with DH/TH lymphoma at the time of transformation from low-grade lymphoma presented with inferior outcomes to patients with de novo DH/TH lymphoma diagnosis:
    • Median OS:8 months versus 22 months, respectively (P = 0.008)
    • EFS12: 10% versus 52%, respectively
  • Patients with high-grade morphological features showed no significant changes in outcomes (OS and EFS12) compared to those with large-cell morphological features (P = 0.09)
  • There was no significant association between MYC partner and OS (P = 0.99)
  • No significant differences in outcomes (OS and EFS12) were observed between patients with MYC/BCL6 (BCL2 negative) rearrangements and those with BCL6 rearrangements (P = 0.16)

These results indicate that subgroups within the DH/TH lymphoma category have different clinical outcomes, with patients transforming from low-grade lymphoma having an inferior OS when compared to patients with de novo DH/TH lymphoma. According to the authors, this study suggests that the genetic partners of MYC rearrangements have no prognostic value (IG versus non-IG gene) on the outcomes of patients with DH/TH lymphoma. Further research is needed to validate these interesting preliminary findings.

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?