All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) after failure of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin (Bv) treatment, or three or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Results from the CheckMate 205 trial on nivolumab in patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) cHL reported durable responses and an acceptable safety profile. Limited data exist on the impact of nivolumab on transplant outcomes.
Here, we present the results of a retrospective, multicenter study, recently published in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Carmen Martínez and colleagues aimed to determine efficacy and safety of nivolumab for treatment of patients with R/R cHL and its impact on transplant outcomes, in a real-life context.1
Study design and patient characteristics1
Results1
Safety
Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 56.8% of patients, with the most common (> 5%) being
Referral for transplantation (41.7%) and disease progression (37.5%) were the main reasons for nivolumab discontinuation. Two patients died due to severe AEs: one was heavily pre-treated and died because of Grade 5 hepatitis, nephritis, and Steven–Johnson syndrome after the first dose of nivolumab; the other patient received four previous therapy lines and died due to Grade 5 pneumonitis after two cycles of nivolumab.
Efficacy
Nivolumab response was evaluable in 72 patients:
Of all evaluable patients (n = 72), six (8.3%) were alive and showing a response to nivolumab without additional treatment. After a median follow-up for survivors at 22 months (range, 6.8–42.8):
Efficacy in patients who did not proceed to auto- or allo-HSCT (n = 29)
In patients who did not proceed to HSCT:
Efficacy in patients who proceeded to HSCT (n = 42)
Of the 42 patients who proceeded to HSCT, three underwent auto-HSCT, 38 underwent allo-HSCT, and one underwent tandem auto-allo-HSCT. Of the three patients who underwent auto-HSCT:
Of the 39 patients proceeding to allo-HSCT:
Comparison analysis of allo-HSCT (n = 27) vs no allo-HSCT (n = 13), to assess the benefit from allo-HSCT as consolidation therapy
The comparison analysis was restricted to patients achieving CR/PR after nivolumab, and the results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics and outcomes
Characteristics and outcomes of patients |
Allo-HSCT n = 27 |
No allo-HSCT n = 13 |
p |
At nivolumab initiation: Age, years (range) Extranodal disease, n (%) Number of prior systemic therapy lines, median (range) Prior auto-HSCT, n (%) Prior allo-HSCT, n (%) |
32 (17–49) 13 (48.1) 4 (3–6)
11 (40.7) 0 |
41 (26–78) 12 (92.3) 6 (2–15)
10 (76.9) 4 (30.8) |
< 0.0001 0.007 0.002
0.032 0.002 |
N of nivolumab cycles, median (range) |
7 (4–44) |
16 (1–89) |
0.009 |
OS, % |
77.5 |
46.2 |
0.126 |
PFS, % |
73.9 |
27.2 |
0.025 |
allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; auto-HSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival
*Value indicated in bold is not statistically significant
Conclusion
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox