All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
The combination of obinutuzumab and lenalidomide is associated with high rates of response and a manageable adverse event (AE) profile in patients with indolent lymphoma, according to the results of two studies presented at the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) Meeting & Exposition, Orlando, US, in December 2019. The studies, which involved patients with previously-untreated, high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (FL)1 and relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or FL2, adds to the growing weight of evidence supporting this chemotherapy-free regimen in the treatment of lymphoma, encouraging further evaluation in both the frontline and salvage settings.
Obinutuzumab is a humanized, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and increases cell death induction compared with rituximab.3 Lenalidomide is a potent immunomodulatory agent that enhances T cell- and natural killer cell-mediated immunity, and inhibits both angiogenesis and the production of proinflammatory cytokines.4 Lenalidomide has previously shown to work synergistically with another anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, in patients with FL. In a phase III trial, RELEVANCE, the combination (R2 regimen) was equally effective as chemotherapy in treating patients with newly diagnosed FL.5 In another phase III trial, AUGMENT, the R2 regimen had superior efficacy compared with rituximab alone in patients with relapsed or refractory FL.6,7 Recent studies investigate the hypothesis that lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab might be more effective and equally well-tolerated.3
In the first study, presented in Orlando by Loretta J. Nastoupil, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, US, 90 patients with previously untreated, Stage II, III, or IV high-tumor-burden FL (Grade 1–3a) received:
Baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Group; FL, follicular lymphoma; FLIPI, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PS, performance status; ULN, upper limit of normal |
|
|
N= 90 (%) |
---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
58 (33–84) |
Male |
47 (52) |
ECOG PS |
|
0 |
67 (74) |
1 |
23 (26) |
Ann Arbor stage |
|
II |
9 (10) |
III |
22 (24) |
IV |
58 (64) |
FL grade |
|
1–2 |
72 (80) |
3a |
18 (20) |
FLIPI score |
|
Low risk (0–1) |
19 (21) |
Intermediate risk (2) |
33 (37) |
High risk (3–5) |
38 (42) |
LDH > ULN |
14 (16) |
Bulky disease (> 7cm) |
31 (34) |
Despite the relatively short follow-up in this study, Dr Nastoupil described the results as “promising.”
“In my opinion, this phase II study suggests that this is a highly active and well tolerated therapy and future study is warranted,” she concluded.
Watch an interview with Loretta Nastoupil, who discusses this study during the 61st ASH meeting in Orlando, here.
The second study, presented by Nathan H. Fowler, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, US, was designed primarily to determine the maximum tolerated dose and efficacy of the combination therapy in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. Sixty-six patients with relapsed SLL, MZL, or FL Grade 1–3a were treated with a target dose of lenalidomide (20mg) plus obinutuzumab (1000mg):
No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the dose escalation phase of the study and the majority of patients received the target dose. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 2.
|
N= 66 (%) |
---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
64 (36–81) |
Male |
35 (53) |
Histology at diagnosis |
|
MZL |
4 (6) |
SLL |
5 (8) |
FL |
57 (86) |
Prior lines of therapy |
|
1 |
14 (23) |
2 |
31 (47) |
≥ 3 |
17 (26) |
Rituximab refractory |
16 (24) |
Prior chemotherapy backbone |
50 (76) |
Prior lenalidomide + rituximab |
3 (5) |
CR, complete response; CRu, unconfirmed complete response; FL, follicular lymphoma; MZL, marginal zone lymphoma; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; POD24, progression of disease within 2 years; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma |
|||||
|
MZL/SLL |
FL |
Rituximab-refractory |
≥ 3rd-line |
POD24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORR, n (%) |
8 (88) |
57 (100) |
16 (100) |
30 (97) |
26 (96) |
CR/CRu |
4 (44) |
43 (75) |
10 (63) |
21 (68) |
18 (66) |
PR |
4 (44) |
14 (25) |
6 (37) |
9 (29) |
8 (30) |
SD, n (%) |
12 (25) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (3) |
1 (4) |
PD, n (%) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
The combination of lenalidomide and obinutuzumab seems to be effective, with high response rates achieved in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma, including those who are refractory to rituximab. The toxicity profile of the combination was reported to be manageable and similar to that observed with lenalidomide and rituximab.
“Larger phase III trials are needed to truly understand if this regimen is better than R2 in the relapse setting,” concluded Dr Fowler.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox