All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) includes a variety of subtypes and the behavior, treatment, and outcomes associated with NHL are equally varied. Most NHLs, however, originate from B cells, and B-cell NHL may be further categorized into its indolent (follicular lymphoma [FL] and marginal zone lymphoma [MZL]) and aggressive (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL] and mantle cell lymphoma [MCL]) forms. While outcomes have improved for both the indolent and aggressive NHLs, relapse is still a common occurrence, and relapsed disease is associated with poorer outcomes.1
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have emerged as potential treatment options, with four of these agents (idelalisib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and umbralisib) currently approved for various indications. There are several PI3K isoforms (α, β, γ, and δ) that may be targeted by these agents, and each of these isoforms plays one or more roles in both B-cell NHLs and in healthy lymphocytes, which has led to challenges associated with the safety of PI3K inhibitors.1
At the 63rd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, three abstracts were presented regarding parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective next-generation PI3Kδ inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL (CITADEL-203, presented by Ryan C. Lynch), R/R MZL (CITADEL-204, presented by Tycel Phillips), and R/R MCL (CITADEL-205, presented by Amitkumar Mehta), respectively. We summarize the data presented below.2-4
CITADEL-203 is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial of parsaclisib monotherapy in patients with R/R FL.2 Eligible patients:
The primary endpoint was objective response rate, and secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Patients received 20 mg parsaclisib once daily for 8 weeks, at which point patients in the weekly dosing group (WG) received 20 mg parsaclisib once weekly, and patients in the daily dosing group (DG) received 2.5 mg parsaclisib daily (Figure 1). All patients received prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Daily dosing was selected during an interim analysis as the recommended dosing regimen.
Figure 1. CITADEL-203 study design*
FL, follicular lymphoma; R/R, relapsed/refractory.
*Adapted from Lynch, et al.2
The data cutoff for the primary analysis was January 15, 2021, at which point 126 patients had been treated (23 in the WG and 103 in the DG). The median age was 67.5 years (range, 40‒88 years), and 55.6% were male.
The median treatment duration was 8.5 months (range, 0.5–27.2 months) and the median follow up was 20.6 months (range, 5.7‒34.1 months) for all treated patients. In the DG, median treatment duration and median follow up were 8.4 months (range, 0.8‒27.2 months) and 17.6 months (range, 5.7‒33.1 months), respectively.
Responses in the overall cohort and the weekly and daily dosing groups are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Responses by dosing group and overall (per independent review committee)*
Response, % |
WG (n = 23) |
DG (n = 103) |
Total (N = 126) |
---|---|---|---|
ORR |
65.2 |
77.7 |
75.4 |
95% CI |
42.7‒83.6 |
68.4‒85.3 |
66.9‒82.6 |
Complete response |
13.0 |
19.4 |
18.3 |
Partial response |
52.2 |
58.3 |
57.1 |
CI, confidence interval; DG, daily dosing group; ORR, objective response rate; WG, weekly dosing group. |
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in almost all patients (97.6%), and Grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in 58.7% of patients.
CITADEL-204 is a phase 2, open-label study of parsaclisib as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with R/R MZL.3 Eligible patients:
The primary and secondary endpoints and treatment allocation/dosing (WG and DG) were the same as CITADEL-203. Patients in CITADEL-204 were also treated prophylactically for P. jirovecii pneumonia.
Two cohorts were enrolled in this study. Cohort 1 included patients who had been treated previously with ibrutinib (n = 10) and Cohort 2 included patients who were naïve to BTK inhibitor therapy (n = 100). This abstract presentation included data from Cohort 2 only. Twenty-eight patients in Cohort 2 were assigned to the WG, and 72 were assigned to the DG. The median age was 71.0 years (range, 35‒95 years), and 53.0% were male.
The median treatment duration was 13.4 months (range, 0.4‒30.9 months), and the median follow up was 22.8 months (range, 11.9‒37.0 months) for all treated patients; in the DG, median treatment duration and median follow up were 11.6 months (range, 0.4‒30.9 months) and 21.0 months (range, 11.9‒37.0 months), respectively.
Responses in the weekly and daily dosing groups and by MZL subtypes in Cohort 2 are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Responses in BTKi-naïve patients overall, by dosing group, and by MZL subtype*
By dosing group |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Response, % |
WG (n = 28) |
DG (n = 72) |
Total (N = 100) |
ORR |
57.1 |
58.3 |
58.0 |
95% CI |
37.2‒75.5 |
46.1‒69.8 |
47.7‒67.8 |
Complete response |
10.7 |
4.2 |
6.0 |
Partial response |
46.4 |
54.2 |
52.0 |
By MZL subtype (both dosing groups) |
|||
Response, % |
Nodal (n = 31) |
Extranodal (n = 34) |
Splenic (n = 35) |
ORR |
51.6 |
55.9 |
65.7 |
95% CI |
33.1‒69.8 |
37.9‒72.8 |
47.8‒80.9 |
Complete response |
6.5 |
8.8 |
2.9 |
Partial response |
45.2 |
47.1 |
62.9 |
CI, confidence interval; DG, daily dosing group; MZL, marginal zone lymphoma; ORR, objective response rate; WG, weekly dosing group. |
TEAEs occurred in 96.0% of patients, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 63.0% of patients.
CITADEL-205 is a phase 2, open-label study investigating parsaclisib as monotherapy for patients with R/R MCL. Eligible patients:4
The primary endpoint, as in the other two CITADEL trials, was ORR, and secondary endpoints were CRR, DoR, OS, PFS, and safety. Treatment and dosing were also the same as in the other two trials, with patients allocated into WG or DG after 8 weeks of daily parsaclisib treatment.
As of the data cutoff, 108 patients who were naïve to BTK inhibitors had been treated, with 31 in the WG and 77 in the DG. The median age was 72 years (range, 43‒90 years), and 79.6% were male.
The median treatment duration was 8.3 months (range, 0.1‒30.0 months), and the median follow up was 22.9 months (range, 11.6‒35.9 months) for all treated patients; in the DG, median treatment duration and median follow up were 7.9 months (range, 1.7‒27.4 months) and 18.2 months (range, 11.6‒35.9 months), respectively.
Responses by treatment group and overall are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Response by treatment group and overall*
Response, % |
WG (n = 31) |
DG (n = 77) |
Total (N = 108) |
---|---|---|---|
ORR |
64.5 |
70.1 |
68.5 |
95% CI |
45.4–80.8 |
58.6–80.0 |
58.9–77.1 |
Complete response |
22.6 |
15.6 |
17.6 |
Partial response |
41.9 |
54.5 |
50.9 |
CI, confidence interval; DG, daily dosing group; ORR, overall response rate; WG, weekly dosing group. |
TEAEs occurred in 90.7% of patients, with Grade ≥3 TEAEs in 62.0%.
These three studies (CITADEL-203, CITADEL-204, and CITADEL-205) demonstrate rapid responses with parsaclisib in patients with FL, MZL, and MCL, respectively, and the responses seen have thus far been durable, with the caveat that the median follow up in these trials (at the point of data cutoff) was under 2 years. The safety data are largely in line with other PI3K/PI3Kδ inhibitors, with diarrhea and colitis consistently being the most common reason for discontinuation of parsaclisib. It will be interesting to see where parsaclisib falls among other PI3K inhibitors at the final analysis when efficacy data have matured, particularly OS data.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox