All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
The therapeutic potential and efficacy of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) against B-cell malignancies, have long been established. In fact, the first generation BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, is an approved regimen for multiple malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).1 Nevertheless, off-target toxicities are a key issue with ibrutinib treatment. Second generation BTKi with better selectivity, like zanubrutinib, might improve safety and tolerability of BTKi treatment in patients with B-cell malignancies.
For that, Constantine Tam, a member of our Scientific Advisory Board, and colleagues, conducted a phase Ib trial (NCT02569476)2 to investigate the safety and preliminary efficacy of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab in patients with CLL/SLL or follicular lymphoma (FL). The results of this study were published in Blood Advances2 and are summarized below.
Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) up to 29 days after the initial dose were evaluated.
Figure 1. Patient disposition in Part 2 of the study2
AE, adverse event; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; FL, follicular lymphoma, PD, progressive disease; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma; TN, treatment-naïve.Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics2
ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; FL, follicular lymphoma; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma. |
|||
Characteristic |
Part 1 |
Part 2 |
|
---|---|---|---|
CLL/SLL |
R/R FL |
||
Median age, years (range) |
68 (51–86) |
68 (38–82) |
59 (34–86) |
ECOG PS, n (%) 0 1 2 |
9 2 1 |
20 (44) 24 (53) 1 (2) |
28 (78) 6 (17) 2 (6) |
Prior treatment status, n (%) Naïve R/R |
0 12 |
20 (44) 25 (56) |
0 (0) 36 (100) |
Rituximab-refractory for R/R FL, n (%) |
— |
— |
14 (39) |
Refractory to most recent line of therapy, n (%) |
— |
— |
12 (33) |
Median number of prior therapies (range) |
n = 12 |
n = 25 |
n = 36 |
2 (1–9) |
1 (1–4) |
2 (1–9) |
|
Bulky disease, cm Node > 5 Node > 10 |
— — |
15 (33) 0 (0) |
17 (47) 4 (11) |
Molecular risk factors (n = 39), n (%) Unmutated IGHV del(17p)/p53 mutation del(11q) Complex karyotype |
— — — — |
19 (49) 16 (41) 10 (26) 9 (23) |
— — — — |
Table 2. Most common AEs and AEs of special interest reported in Part 2 of the study2
AEs, adverse events; AF, atrial fibrillation; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; FL, follicular lymphoma; IRR, infusion-related reactions; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma; URT, upper respiratory tract. |
||||
Most common AEs (≥ 15%), n (%) |
All Grade AEs |
Grade ≥ 3 AEs |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLL/SLL |
FL |
CLL/SLL |
FL |
|
URT infection |
23 (51.1) |
14 (38.9) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
Neutropenia |
20 (44.4) |
6 (16.7) |
14 (31.1) |
5 (13.9) |
Contusion |
15 (33.3) |
10 (27.8) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
Cough |
12 (26.7) |
8 (22.2) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
Diarrhea |
12 (26.7) |
6 (16.7) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
Fatigue |
12 (26.7) |
9 (25.0) |
1 (2.2) |
0 (0) |
Pyrexia |
10 (22.2) |
— |
0 (0) |
— |
Thrombocytopenia |
8 (17.8) |
7 (19.4) |
3 (6.7) |
2 (5.6) |
Pneumonia |
7 (15.6) |
— |
4 (8.9) |
— |
AEs of special interest, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Infections |
39 (87) |
24 (67) |
17 (38) |
7 (19) |
Diarrhea |
12 (27) |
6 (17) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
IRR |
11 (24) |
5 (14) |
1 (2) |
0 (0) |
Hypertension |
4 (9) |
3 (8) |
3 (7) |
3 (8) |
Major hemorrhage |
0 (0) |
1 (3) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
AF |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
Table 3. Preliminary efficacy outcomes2
EFS, event-free survival; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CR, complete response; DoR, duration of response; FL, follicular lymphoma; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma. |
|||
Outcome, n (%) |
CLL/SLL* |
FL† |
|
---|---|---|---|
|
Naïve |
R/R |
R/R |
ORR |
20 (100) |
23 (92) |
26 (72) |
CR |
6 (30) |
7 (28) |
14 (39) |
PR |
14 (70) |
16 (64) |
12 (33) |
SD |
0 (0) |
2 (8) |
6 (17) |
PD |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
4 (11) |
ORR for patients with del(17p)/p53 mutation, n/N (%) |
6/6 (100) |
8/10 (80) |
— |
Median DoR, months (range) |
NR |
NR (18.4–NE) |
|
Median PFS, months (range) |
NR |
25 (0.7–36.0) |
|
EFS for DoR at 24 months, % (95% CI) |
90.4 (76.5–96.3) |
62.3 (37.0–79.9) |
The results of this phase Ib trial showed that the combination of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab is well tolerated in patients with CLL/SLL or FL. With the exception of neutropenia, the toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports of that with single agent zanubrutinib. It should be noted, that no Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, no atrial fibrillation and low incidence of hypertension (< 10%) were reported here with the use of zanubrutinib. The preliminary efficacy of this combination showed very promising activity, especially in patients with naïve CLL/SLL (100% overall response rate [ORR]) and R/R CLL/SLL (92% ORR). The ORR was also good in patients with R/R FL (72%) considering their heavily pretreated nature. However, promising, large-scale prospective trials are needed to validate these results.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox