All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, Sobi, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase I/Ib BGB-11417-101 trial: Sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib in TN CLL/SLL

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jul 17, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small lymphocytic lymphoma.


Results from the phase I/Ib BGB-11417-101 (NCT04277637) study evaluating sonrotoclax + zanubrutinib in 137 patients with treatment-naïve (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) were presented by Chan Y. Cheah at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. Patients received zanubrutinib + either sonrotoclax 160 mg (n = 51) or 320 mg (n = 86). The primary objectives were to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and to evaluate safety and tolerability. 

Key data: Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 68.6% of patients in the sonrotoclax 160 mg group vs 60.5% of patients in the 320 mg group. Serious TEAEs occurred in 39.2% vs 31.4% of patients, with no tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) or TEAEs leading to death in either dose group. Neutropenia was the most common Grade ≥3 TEAE (160 mg, 24%; 320 mg, 31%). The overall response rates (ORRs) were 100% in both dose groups, with complete responses (CRs) in 51.0% vs 59.5% of patients. Sonrotoclax 320 mg was selected as the RP2D. The 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the 320 mg group was 100%. Undetectable measurable residual disease at 10−4(uMRD4) rates increased from 81.2% at Week 24 to 98.2% at Week 96. At Week 96, uMRD4 rates were 91.7% and 96.8% in patients with mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) and unmutated IGHV, respectively, and 92.9% and 97.7% in patients with mutated TP53/del(17p) and no TP53 mutation/del(17p), respectively.  

Key learning: Sonrotoclax 320 mg + zanubrutinib demonstrated high response rates in patients with TN CLL/SLL, with rates of uMRD4 negativity >90%, including in patients with high-risk disease, and the safety profile was manageable. This combination is being further investigated in phase III trials in TN CLL (NCT06073821 and NCT07277231) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; NCT06742996). 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?