All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, Sobi, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Results from the open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase III POLARGO trial (NCT04182204), evaluating polatuzumab vedotin + rituximab + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (Pola-R-GemOx; n = 129) vs rituximab + gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (R-GemOx; n = 126) in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who were transplant-ineligible, were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Matasar et al. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population.
Key data: The primary endpoint was met; after a median follow-up of 24.6 months, Pola-R-GemOx resulted in a 40% reduction in the risk of death vs R-GemOx (median OS, 19.5 months vs 12.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.83; p = 0.0017). Pola-R-GemOx also improved median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.4 months vs 2.7 months; HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.27–0.51; p < 0.0001) and complete response (CR) rates (40.3% vs 19.0%; p < 0.0001) vs R-GemOx. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia (any grade) occurred in 53.1% of patients in the Pola-R-GemOx group vs 40.8% in the R-GemOx group (Grade 3/4, 34.4% vs 26.4%). Neutropenia (any grade) occurred in 41.4% vs 41.6% of patients (Grade 3/4, 33.6% vs 30.4%), respectively. Peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with Pola-R-GemOx vs R-GemOx (57% vs 28.8%) and was primarily Grade 1.
Key learning: Pola-R-GemOx demonstrated significant improvements in OS, PFS, and CR rates vs R‑GemOx in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL, with no new safety signals identified, supporting Pola-R-GemOx as an additional treatment option for this patient population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content