All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III study of obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with previously untreated FL

By Sara Valente

Share:

Aug 15, 2018


On 19 July 2018, a paper was published in the International Journal of Hematology by Ken Ohmachi, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan, and colleagues on a sub-analysis of the GALLIUM phase III study (NCT01332968). This sub-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL).

The GALLIUM phase III study assessed the use of obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy (G-chemo) compared with rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in previously untreated FL.

Study Overview

  • N = 123 patients included in the Japanese sub-group; n = 65 received G-chemo; n = 58 received R-chemo
    • Patient characteristics of G-chemo: 33.8% = male; median age = 61 (range, 42–77)
    • Patient characteristics of R-chemo: 41.4% = male; median age = 61.5 (range, 39–85)
  • Primary endpoint: Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (INV-PFS)
  • Secondary endpoints included; Overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) at the end of study (EOI), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), duration of response (DOR), time to new anti-lymphoma treatment (TTNALT) and safety

Key Findings

  • 3-year PFS for G-chemo vs R-chemo:
    • 9% (95% CI, 78.7–95.3) vs 74.7% (95% CI, 57.6–85.8)
      • HR 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–1.15), P = 0.08
    • 3-year OS = 96.9% (G-chemo) vs2% (R-chemo)
    • ORR = 92.3% (G-chemo) vs4% (R-chemo); (95% CI, 0.93 (− 9.7, 11.6); P = 0.75)
      • CR = 35.4% (G-chemo) vs5% (R-chemo); (95% CI, 0.90 (− 17.0, 18.8); P = 0.94)
    • EFS and TTNALT = improvement was seen in G-chemo vs R-chemo
    • Most frequent adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 for G-chemo vs R-chemo
      • Neutropenia = 90.8% vs 3%
      • Leukopenia = 21.5% vs1%
      • Febrile neutropenia = 20% vs3%

The authors concluded that the results from the analysis of the Japanese sub-group on the GALLIUM study were consistent with the results from the global population. This demonstrated ‘clinically meaningful improvements in PFS in first-line FL patients treated with G-chemo vs R-chemo’. Additionally, the authors noted that there were high rates of neutropenia seen in Japanese patients and commented that these may ‘reflect the extensive use of CHOP chemotherapy in Japan.’

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?