All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer.   View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Prognostic value of CLL-IPI in R/R CLL

By Sylvia Agathou

Share:

Nov 19, 2018


An evaluation of the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) International Prognostic Index (IPI) in idelalisib phase III trials was published on 8 November 2018 in Leukemia Lymphoma, by lead author Jacob Soumerai from Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA.

The CLL-IPI is commonly used as a prognostic marker in naïve CLL but its use in relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL has not yet been determined. The CLL-IPI system consists of five adverse prognostic factors, including age (> 65 years; one point), Rai I–IV or Binet B/C (one point), β2-microglobulin (B2M, > 3.5 mg/L; two points), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV; two points), and TP53 mutation and/or deletion (four points). Depending on the scoring from these five factors, patients are separated into four CLL-IPI risk groups: low (score 0–1), intermediate (score 2–3), high (score 4–6), and very high (score 7–10). The aim of this study was to evaluate results from three phase III trials (115 [NCT01569295], 116 [NCT01539512], and 119 [NCT01659021]) using idelalisib treatment for R/R CLL, so as to determine the prognostic value of CLL-IPI for this population. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS).

Study design

  • N = 897 R/R CLL patients randomized and treated from three phase III studies (115 [N = 416], 116 [N = 210], and 119 [N = 171])
  • Of those, n = 864 (96.3%) patients were included in the complete analysis dataset
  • Patients considered in the idelalisib arm (n = 491)
    • Study 115 (NCT01569295):
      • Patients who received idelalisib plus rituximab and bendamustine
    • Study 116 (NCT01539512):
      • Patients who received idelalisib plus rituximab
    • Study 119 (NCT01659021):
      • Patients who received idelalisib plus ofatumumab
    • Patients considered in the comparator arm (n = 406)
      • Study 115:
        • Patients who received placebo plus rituximab and bendamustine
      • Study 116:
        • Patients who received placebo plus rituximab
      • Study 119:
        • Patients who received placebo plus ofatumumab
      • Median age (range) = 66 (32–92) years
      • Median number of prior lines (range) = 3 (1–13)
      • Median follow-up (range) = 21.4 (0.03–45.3) months (290 deaths)

Results

Whole cohort (idelalisib and comparator arms):

  • CLL-IPI scoring risk groups:
    • Low: 2.2%
    • Intermediate: 12.8%
    • High: 48.7%
    • Very high: 36.2%
  • The CLL-IPI risk score was prognostic for OS in R/R CLL patients (log rank test across risk groups P < 0.0001; C-statistic of 0.706 [95% CI, 0.587–0.813])
  • 24-month OS rates per CLL-IPI risk group:
    • Low: 93.3%
    • Intermediate: 88.3%
    • High: 69.8%
    • Very high: 52.6%
    • Statistical significant differences in OS were observed between intermediate and high (HR = 3.044), and between high and very high risk groups (HR = 1.835) but not between low and intermediate risk groups (HR = 1.846)

Idelalisib versus comparator arm:

  • The CLL-IPI was prognostic for OS in the comparator subgroup (log rank test across risk groups P < 0.0001; C-statistic of 0.736; 95% CI, 0.565–0.879) and for OS in the idelalisib subgroup (log rank test across risk groups P < 0.0001; C-statistic of 0.682; 95% CI, 0.509–0.834)
  • The CLL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in patients who received chemo-immunotherapy (study 115; C-statistic 0.742; 95% CI, 0.563–0.889) or CD20 antibody therapy (studies 116 and 119; C-statistic 0.670; 95% CI, 0.503–0.819)

Multivariate analysis for CLL-IPI variables:

  • From the five factors used to calculate the CLL-IPI, prognostic for OS were:
    • Age > 65 (HR = 1.5; [95% CI, 1.18–1.91]; P = 0.001)
    • B2M > 3.5 mg/L (HR = 2.64; [95% CI, 1.77–3.94]; P < 0.0001)
    • IGHV unmutated (HR = 1.48; [95% CI, 1.06–2.07]; P = 0.02)
    • TP53 mutation and/or deletion (HR = 2.05; [95% CI, 1.63–2.58]; P < 0.0001)
  • From the five factors used to calculate the CLL-IPI, non-prognostic for OS were:
    • Rai I–IV or Binet B/C stage (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.32–5.2, P = 0.72)
  • Only age significantly affected OS when considering with idelalisib treatment (P = 0.0359) but no other CLL-IPI factor was associated with idelalisib treatment

The results from this analysis demonstrate that the CLL-IPI scoring system is prognostic for OS in R/R CLL patients. Nevertheless, the multivariate analysis suggested that the contribution of each CLL-IPI scored factor might be different in R/R CLL. Thus, the authors recommend a slightly modified CLL-IPI scoring system that will provide a good prognostic factor for outcomes in R/R CLL.

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following would most increase your confidence in referring patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma for CAR T-cell therapy?