All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, Roche and sobi, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
On 10 February 2019, Monika Dlugosz-Danecka from Jagiellonian University, Krakow, PL, and colleagues, published in Cancer Medicine a retrospective analysis investigating the prognostic value of chemotherapy dose intensity for survival outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Currently, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) provides one of the main tools for outcome prognosis in DLBCL. In this study, the average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) combination was assessed as a potential outcome predictor in DLBCL patients, independently of IPI. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included, progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment response.
References
Your opinion matters
What types of support services or resources do you think would best facilitate the safe implementation of the BrECADD regimen in clinical practice?