All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Reducing ibrutinib dose shown not to adversely affect CLL patient outcome

Mar 17, 2017


In February 2017 in a correspondence in the British Journal of Haematology, Anthony R. Mato, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues published results of a multicenter retrospective study into the efficacy of dose reduction in CLL patients. Retrospective chart review was conducted for ibrutinib treated CLL patients at three institutions between January 2010 and October 2015. Reduced dose was defined as being below the approved US FDA daily dose of 420 mg for longer than 2 months at treatment initiation or within 3 months of initiation.

Key highlights:

  • Identified 197 CLL pts treated with ibrutinib (R/R CLL = 81% pts, ND CLL = 19%)
    • Reduced ibrutinib dose = 37 pts (19%)
  • No reported difference in baseline patient characteristics
  • Median ibrutinib daily dosage:
    • Standard dose group = 5.1 mg/kg
    • Reduced dose group = 4.3 mg/kg
  • Results:
    • ORR: Standard dose = 85%, Reduced dose = 84%
    • Median OS: Standard dose = not reached, Reduced dose = not reached (P = 0.5)
    • Median PFS: Standard dose = 37.4 months, Reduced dose = not reached (P = 0.6)
  • Cox-regression univariate analysis:
    • PFS: standard reduced dose = 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5–2.6)
    • OS: standard reduced dose = 0.6 (95% CI, 0.14–2.7)
  • Reasons for ibrutinib dose reduction: G.I. toxicity 16%, bleeding (11%), pharmacokinetic considerations (11%)

In conclusion, the authors state that to their knowledge “this report describes the largest real-world experience of reduced dose ibrutinib in CLL patients” and that reducing ibrutinib dose has been shown for the first time to not result in poorer clinical outcome. The authors argue that future studies should consider weight-based dosing in light of this data, and that reduced dose may result in treatment cost-savings. The authors also acknowledge the small, retrospective nature of this study as being limitations, but they suggest that the data may provide reassurance in cases where reduction is required.

Abstract:

N/A

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.

Your opinion matters

When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?