All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
In January 2018, Stephen P. Robinson, from the University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK, and colleagues from the EBMT lymphoma working party, published online in Bone Marrow Transplantation a retrospective, long-term outcome analysis study on the effects of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
RIST has mainly been used in MCL patients who relapse following first-line treatments, such as cytarabine, rituximab and autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). Nevertheless, the long-term efficacy and safety of RIST remain unclear. This study sought to gather retrospective registry data of the largest patient cohorts, to examine the effects of RIST on MCL, after the longest ever reported median follow-up of 72 months. The primary endpoints of the study included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and disease progression following RIST.
In this retrospective study, a long-term follow-up of the largest MCL patient cohort having undergone RIST was presented. The main results of this study included a 1-year NRM of 24%, mainly attributable to GvHD and infections and a high relapse rate of 40%, 5-years after RIST. According to the authors, these results suggest that RIST could have curative potential for high-risk MCL patients, as an alternative to autoSCT and following appropriate toxicity management. Two unexpected results that might be of interest for future MCL treatment strategies, were also reported: (a) the protective effect of ATG/ALG conditioning; and (b) the deleterious effect of CAMPATH prior to RIST. Major limitations of this study include the retrospective basis of the collected data and the fact that only RIST cases between 2000–2008 were taken into consideration. Nevertheless, this study provides useful information for the successful management of MCL.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
When selecting the next therapy for patients with R/R MCL after BTKi progression, what is your most important consideration?