The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
On 10th August 2017, results of the phase III, multicenter, randomized, GOYA trial (NCT01287741) were published by Umberto Vitolo from Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy, et al. in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of obinutuzumab (G) plus CHOP versus rituximab (R) plus CHOP in patients with treatment naïve, advanced stage, CD20+, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Overall, 1,418 patients were enrolled from 207 centers across 29 counties and were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either G-CHOP (n=706) or R-CHOP (n=712). The primary outcome measure of the GOYA trial was investigator-assessed PFS.
Overall, CHOP combined with G or R achieved similar efficacy for PFS, as well as other secondary time-to-event end points. The authors also stated that “no new safety signals were identified”; however, infections, neutropenia, IRRs, cardiac events, thrombocytopenia, and hemorrhagic events of any grade, in addition to grade 3–5 AEs and SAEs, were more common with G-CHOP compared to R-CHOP.
Back in June, during this year’s International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML), we spoke with Professor Marek Trněný from Charles University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, about the GOYA trial; watch here.
Purpose Rituximab (R) plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy is the standard of care in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Obinutuzumab (G) is a glycoengineered, type II, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. GOYA was a randomized phase III study that compared G-CHOP with R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated advanced-stage DLBCL. Methods Patients (N = 1,418) were randomly assigned to receive eight 21-day cycles of G (n = 706) or R (n = 712), plus six or eight cycles of CHOP. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results After median observation of 29 months, the number of investigator-assessed PFS events was similar between G (201; 28.5%) and R (215; 30.2%), stratified hazard ratio was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.11; P = .39), and 3-year PFS rates were 70% and 67%, respectively. Secondary end points of independently reviewed PFS, other time-to-event end points, and tumor response rates were similar between arms. In exploratory subgroup analyses, patients with germinal-center B cell-like subtype had a better PFS than did patients with activated B cell-like subtype, irrespective of treatment. Frequencies of grade 3 to 5 adverse events (AEs; 73.7% v 64.7%, respectively) and serious AEs (42.6% v 37.6%, respectively) were higher with G-CHOP compared with R-CHOP. Fatal AE frequencies were 5.8% for G-CHOP and 4.3% for R-CHOP. The most common AEs were neutropenia (G-CHOP, 48.3%; R-CHOP, 40.7%), infusion-related reactions (G-CHOP, 36.1%; R-CHOP, 23.5%), nausea (G-CHOP, 29.4%; R-CHOP, 28.3%), and constipation (G-CHOP, 23.4%; R-CHOP, 24.5%). Conclusion G-CHOP did not improve PFS compared with R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL.
References