TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

SYMPATICO: Is ibrutinib combined with venetoclax safe and effective in patients with R/R MCL?

By Sabina Ray

Share:

Featured:

Michael WangMichael Wang

Jan 5, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in R/R MCL.


During the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Lymphoma Hub spoke to Michael Wang, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, US. We asked, Is ibrutinib combined with venetoclax safe and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)?

SYMPATICO: Is ibrutinib combined with venetoclax safe and effective in patients with R/R MCL?

Firstly, Wang discusses key findings from the SYMPATICO study (NCT03112174) investigating ibrutinib + venetoclax vs ibrutinib + placebo in patients with R/R MCL; results showed longer median progression-free survival with ibrutinib + venetoclax vs ibrutinib + placebo (32 months vs 22 months, respectively) and higher overall response rates (82% vs 74%, respectively). The safety profiles between both treatment arms were comparable, with fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea reported as the most common adverse events of any grade. Finally, he concluded that ibrutinib + venetoclax is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with R/R MCL compared with ibrutinib + placebo, and this combination is already a standard-of-care treatment in several countries.

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content