All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. View funders.

2018-10-29T17:13:42.000Z

The long-term effect of intensive first-line treatment in advanced-stage HL

Oct 29, 2018
Share:

Bookmark this article

In October 2018, Bastian von Tresckow and colleagues, published on behalf of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) in The Lancet Haematology, a pre-planned follow-up analysis of two GHSG trials (HD9 and HD12 [NCT00265031]), which evaluated the use of intensive first-line chemotherapy in newly-diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. The aim of this analysis was to assess whether patient outcomes are impaired after a 10- or 15-year follow-up.

The primary analyzes of the HD9 and HD12 indicated that first-line chemotherapy aids tumor control and improves survival in advanced-stage HL patients. The primary endpoint of this follow-up study was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included, overall survival (OS) and the incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm.

Study design

  • HD9
    • From 1993−1998, N = 1282 newly-diagnosed, advanced-stage HL patients received eight alternating cycles of COPP and ABVD (COPP/ABVD), bBEACOPP or eBEACOPP
    • Median observation time in HD9 (range) = 141 (101−204) months
  • HD12
    • From 1999−2003, N = 1670 newly-diagnosed, advanced stage HL patients received eight cycles of eBEACOPP or four cycles of eBEACOPP plus four cycles of bBEACOPP (4 + 4), plus consolidation radiotherapy to initial bulk and residual disease or no radiotherapy
    • Median observation time in HD12 (range) = 97 (69−143) months
  • In both trials, patients were stratified to regimen according to centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, the presence or absence of a large mediastinal mass, and bulky disease

Key findings 

  • HD9 – Patient outcomes
    • For COPP/ABVD, 15-year PFS = 57.0% (95% CI, 50.0−0) and 15-year OS = 72.3% (95% CI, 66.5–78.1)
    • For bBEACOPP, 15-year PFS = 66.8% (95% CI, 61.9–71.8) and 15-year OS = 74.5% (95% CI, 70.1–78.9)
    • For eBEACOPP, 15-year PFS = 74.0% (95% CI, 69.0–79.0) and 15-year OS = 80.9% (95% CI, 76.7–85.0)
    • Both, PFS and OS in patients treated with eBEACOPP remained significantly higher than those seen in the COPP/ABVD group (HR = 0.53, [95% CI, 0.41–0.69]; P < 0·0001, and HR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50–0.93]; P = 0·015, respectively)
  • HD9 – Toxicity
    • For COPP/ABVD, 15-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm = 7.2% (95% CI, 3.7−7)
    • For bBEACOPP, 15-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm = 13.0% (95% CI, 9.1–16.9)
    • For eBEACOPP, 15-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm = 11.4% (95% CI, 7.6–15.1)
  • HD12 – Patient outcomes
    • For the 4 + 4 regimen, 10-year PFS = 80.6% (95% CI, 77.4−7) and 10-year OS = 86.8% (95% CI, 84.2–89.4)
    • For eBEACOPP, 10-year PFS = 82.6% (95% CI, 79.6–85.6) and 10-year OS = 87.3% (95% CI, 84.7–89.9)
    • The 4 + 4 regimen was not inferior to eBEACOPP, both in terms of PFS and OS outcomes with a non-inferiority margin of 1.5 (HR = 1.13 [95% CI, 0·89–1·43] and HR = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.77–1.36], respectively)
  • HD12 – Toxicity
    • For the 4 + 4 regimen, 10-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm = 6.4% (95% CI, 3.3−5)
    • For eBEACOPP, 10-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasm = 8.8% (95% CI, 5.2–12.4)

The long-term follow-up of the HD9 and HD12 studies showed that intensive first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed advanced stage HL patients maintains its PFS and OS benefits even after 10 or 15 years. The analysis also indicated that eBEACOPP is a superior regimen for advance-stage HL. Nevertheless, the authors stated that the incidence of second primary malignant neoplasms is quite high and that more tolerable treatments need to be developed for HL.

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the Lymphoma Hub?
26 votes - 5 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox