All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Transplant outcomes in double-hit and double-expressor lymphoma

By Devona Williams

Share:

Feb 12, 2018


Alex Herrera of City of Hope in Duarte, California, and colleagues, performed a retrospective analysis of allogeneic stem cell transplant outcomes in patients with double-hit (DHL) or double-expressor lymphomas (DEL). This was published in the November 28 online version of Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

DHL and DEL are aggressive, B-cell lymphomas. DHL is characterized by gene rearrangement of MYC and BLC2 or BCL6. BCL2 chromosome rearrangement is more common, with a rate of 58% to 85% of DHL cases. DEL is described as co-expression of MYC and BCL2. The rearrangement or co-expression causes a rapidly progressive clinical course that is refractory to chemotherapy and leads to poor survival. Earlier work by Herrera showed that outcomes for DEL and DHL after autologous stem cell transplant led to 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of only 48% and 28%, respectively. This multicenter study sought to observe outcomes following allogeneic transplant in these high-risk patients.

Patient Population

  • N = 78 patients
    • DEL = 31 patients
    • DHL = 10 patients
    • Non-DHL, non-DEL = 37 patients
  • Median age
    • DEL = 54 years
    • DHL = 47 years
    • Non-DHL, non-DEL = 55 years
  • Prior autologous transplant
    • DEL = 55%
    • DHL = 70%
    • Non-DHL, non-DEL = 57%
  • Transplant prep regimen
    • Reduced intensity = 77%
    • Myeloablative = 23%

Key Findings

  • 4-year PFS: DEL = 30% (95% CI, 18%–51%) vs non-DEL = 39% (95% CI, 26%–58%), P = 0.24
  • 4-year OS: DEL = 31% (95% CI, 18%–52%) vs non-DEL = 49%, (95% CI, 35%–68%), P = 0.17
  • 4-year PFS DHL = 40% (95% CI, 19%–85%) vs non-DHL = 34% (95% CI, 24%–48%), P = 0.62
  • 4-year OS DHL = 50% (95% CI, 27%–93%) vs non-DHL = 38% (95% CI, 27%–53%), P = 0.46
  • There was no difference in PFS, OS, clinical incidence of remission, or non-relapse mortality in DEL, DHL or non-rearrangement and expressor groups
  • Complete response or partial response pre-transplant was associated with improved PFS and OS
  • Age over 55 years and complete or partial response at transplant were associated with lower risk of relapse
  • No difference in PFS with or without prior autologous transplant

This retrospective analysis showed durable responses for allogeneic transplant in DEL and DHL patients.  In this very high-risk group, allogeneic transplant should be considered a viable treatment option in the relapsed and refractory setting.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content