All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare and aggressive B cell malignancy, often associated with immunosuppression, refractoriness to chemotherapy, and poor outcomes. PBL is characterized by plasmacytic differentiation markers and association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Around 50% of PBL cases harbor MYC translocations, usually rearranging MYC to the heavy chain immunoglobulin locus. However, these genetic aberrations and their role in the molecular pathogenesis of PBL is not well understood. A comprehensive understanding of the mutational landscape in patients will help to improve outcomes in patients with PBL. Frontzek, et al.1 recently published in Nature Communications, a comprehensive genome-wide cohort study investigating the molecular pathogenesis of PBL.
Overall, 96 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue samples were collected from cases of primary PBL; diagnosis was confirmed via central review by expert hematopathologists, and all cases fulfilled the World Health Organization 2017 diagnostic classification criteria.
Several methods were employed in this genome wide study, including:
In total, 86% (82/95) of PBL cases did not express the B-cell antigen CD20 while the remaining 14% (13/95) showed weak and inconsistent expression. Latently EBV-infected tumor cells were seen in 57% (55/96) of all cases, while 33% (17/52) of those with available HIV infection status were HIV positive.
EBV positive PBL cases did not demonstrate any association with special morphologic PBL subtypes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using a break-apart rearrangement probe (BAP) in 57 evaluable cases and a MYC-IgH fusion probe (FP) in 63 cases:
The RAS-RAF pathway was affected by recurrent mutations with the NRAS oncogene being the most frequently mutated gene (Figure 1).
There were recurrent mutations activating the JAK-STAT pathway, with STAT3 mutations occurring in 25% of PBL cases (Figure 1).
TP53 mutations were also frequent (Figure 1), clustering particularly in the DNA binding domain (exons 5-8). However, only 27% of TP53 mutations were clonal, suggesting a later pathogenic event.
Genes affecting the NOTCH signaling pathways were observed in 26% of the samples and included mutations in SPEN (8%), NOTCH1 (7%), NOTCH4 (6%), DTX1 (3%), NOTCH2 (1%), and NOTCH3 (1%).
Figure 1. Frequency of mutations in PBL samples*
†WES in primary PBL cases (n = 85)
*Adapted from Frontzek, et al.1
Overall, 82 PBL samples were scanned for copy number alterations using Oncoscan, and SCNAs were identified using GISTIC v2.0.23. Arm-level amplifications were seen in chromosomes 1q, 7p, and 7q and were detected in 42%, 32%, and 33% of PBL cases, respectively. Recurrent arm-level deletions affected chromosomes 13q, 17p, 18p, and 18q and were detectable in 17%, 26%, 18%, and 16% of cases, respectively.
An amplification of 1q23.1 was most specific, identified in 61% of cases, and a wider amplification of 1q23.1 that affected 60 genes was identified in 52% of samples. The antiapoptotic gene MCL1 was identified within this aberration and represents a therapeutic molecular target.
An amplification of 8q24.13 containing TRIB1 was identified in 32% of cases. This is known to induce MED1/ERK signaling and is also amplified in acute myeloid leukemia.
An amplification of 17q22 containing MS12 was present in 21% of cases. MS12 is also overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia, where is it thought to contribute to poor survival. Deletions at 1p22.1 affecting the gene encoding the potential tumor suppressor RPL5 were identified in 24% of cases and focal deletions of 4q35.2 and 6q26 were identified in 26% and 25% of cases involving the tumor suppressor genes FAT1 and PRKN, respectively.
Corresponding clinical data was available for 49 PBL patients; of those 49 patients, 34 were male, the median age was 62 years, and 82% were treated with a CHOP-like regimen. Nine patients showed a high-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI), 19 an intermediate-risk IPI, and 13 a low-risk IPI. At a median follow up of 21.5 months, 2-year overall survival (OS) was 61%. High-risk IPI patients showed poor 2-year OS of only 11%.
Lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) was significantly inferior in patients who were EBV negative compared with those who were EBV positive (p = 0.002). Significantly inferior outcomes were observed in patients with TP53 mutated PBL compared to patients with TP53 wild type (WT) (p = 0.035). Similarly, NRAS mutations were disposed towards less favorable LSS (p = 0.062) while MYC translocation, MYC expression, and HIV infection had no association with LSS.
Profiles of recurrent mutations were compared with SCNAs for biologically defined subgroups to understand the genetic heterogeneity in PBL (Table 1).
Table 1. Mutations and SCNAs*
Mutations and SCNAs |
% |
p value |
---|---|---|
EBV negative vs positive – del |
||
1p22.1 |
46 vs 11 |
0.0007 |
MYC translocated vs non-translocated - amp |
||
1q43 |
58 vs 21 |
0.0122 |
2q31.3 |
46 vs 14 |
0.0019 |
11q23.3 |
50 vs 18 |
0.0046 |
11q25 |
46 vs 14 |
0.0122 |
12p11.22 |
42 vs 14 |
0.0060 |
Immunocompetent vs immunocompromised patients - del |
||
4q35.2 |
50 vs 11 |
0.0035 |
18p |
33 vs 4 |
0.0083 |
Amp, amplification; del, deletion; EBV, Epstein Barr virus; SCNAs, somatic copy number alterations. |
shRNA directed against MYC, IRF4, and STAT3 were among the most significantly depleted. Transduction of the IRF4 shRNAs induced cytotoxicity in PBL-1 cells and in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines OCI-Ly10 from the activated B-cell subtype, but not in germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL cell lines (which were used as negative controls), confirming an addiction to IRF4 signaling in PBL-1 cells.
This comprehensive genetic analysis in a cohort of primary PBL samples of all subtypes has identified previously unknown genetic alterations affecting the RAS-RAF, JAK-STAT, MCL1, IRF4, and NOTCH pathways, particularly JAK-STAT and IRF4, as therapeutically targetable susceptibilities. Collectively, these preclinical findings warrant further research to improve outcomes in patients with PBL.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox