All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2021-08-12T13:37:48.000Z

Updated efficacy data from the phase I dose-escalation trial of glofitamab in patients with R/R NHL

Aug 12, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

Patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL) have limited treatment options, often resulting in poor outcomes. Bispecific antibodies that bind to both CD3 on T cells, and CD20 on malignant B cells have shown high response and complete remission rates in patients with R/R NHL. Glofitamab is an anti-CD20 and anti-CD3 bispecific antibody currently being investigated in a phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT03075696) for use in patients with R/R NHL. The Lymphoma Hub has previously reported preliminary results from this trial, and more recently interviewed one of the investigators, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Humanitas University, Milan, IT, on how step-up dosing fared when compared with fixed dosing for glofitamab.

During the 26th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA2021), an e-poster on updated findings from the phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT03075696) of glofitamab was presented by Carlo-Stella et al.1 Findings as part of the larger cohort from the same trial that included fixed and step-up dosing (SUD), were also published recently in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.2 The fixed dose cohort demonstrated durable complete response and manageable safety profile in patients with R/R NHL.2 The updated results from the SUD cohort are summarized below.

Study design

This was a phase I dose-escalation trial, with SUD of glofitamab in patients with heavily pre-treated R/R NHL. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, had ≥1 prior lymphoma treatment and ≥1 measurable target lesion (>1/5 cm), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1.

A total of 52 patients received glofitamab SUD: 17 patients received 2.5/10/16 mg; and 35 patients received 2.5/10/30 mg glofitamab SUD. The SUD schedule was as shown in Figure 1. After Cycle 1 SUD, glofitamab was given every 3 weeks for a fixed duration of treatment up to 12 cycles.

Figure 1. Step-up dosing schedule* 

C, cycle; D, day; Gpt, glofitamab fixed dosing with obinutuzumab pre-treatment.
*Adapted from Carlo-Stella et al1 and Hutchings et al.2

  • The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and the antitumor efficacy (per Lugano criteria) of glofitamab.
  • The secondary endpoints included the maximum tolerated, optimal biological, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of glofitamab.

Baseline characteristics

The median age of patients in the SUD cohort was 68 years (44−85) and patients had received a median of three prior lines of therapy (range, 1−12). Fifty-four percent of patients had aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL), and 46% had indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) (see Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics*

Characteristic

2.5/10/16 mg and 2.5/10/30 mg cohorts (n = 52)

Prior therapy, %

              Chemotherapy and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody

100

              Autologous stem-cell transplant

21

              PI3Ki

10

              CAR-T

6

              Cancer immunotherapy

2

Refractory status, %

              Refractory to any prior therapy

85

              Refractory to most recent therapy line

77

              Refractory to any prior anti-CD20

73

Aggressive NHL, %

54

              DLBCL

19

              Transformed FL

12

              Ritcher transformation

10

              MCL

10

              High-grade B-cell lymphoma

2

              FL Grade 3b

2

Indolent NHL, %

46

              FL Grade 1−3a

46

CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T cell; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FL, follicular lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; PI3Ki, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor.
*Adapted from Carlo-Stella et al.1 and Hutchings et al.2

Results

Data presented from cutoff date of December 01, 2020.

Efficacy1,2

  • The best overall response rate (ORR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) rates were 64% and 57%, respectively, in patients with aNHL (see Table 2).
  • Patients in the aNHL arm showed a trend of improved response at the RP2D (2.5/10/30mg; n = 14), with a CMR rate of 71%.
  • Four of the five patients (80%) with mantle cell lymphoma (2.5/10/16mg, n=2; 2.5/10/30mg, n=2) also attained CMR.
  • At a median follow-up of 8 months, patients with aNHL demonstrated ongoing CMR in 13 of 16 patients, with eight CMRs lasting >3 months and five for >6 months.
  • Similarly, at a median follow-up of 6 months, patients with iNHL also showed ongoing CMR in 16 of 17 patients, with ten CMRs lasting >3 months and three for >6 months.

Table 2. Response rates*

Response, %

All patients

2.5/10/16 mg cohort

2.5/10/30 mg cohort

Aggressive NHL

n = 28

n = 14

n = 14

              CMR

57

43

71

              PMR

7

7

7

              ORR (CMR + PMR)

64

50

78

Indolent NHL

n = 24

n = 3

n = 21

              CMR

71

67

71

              PMR

8

33

5

              ORR (CMR + PMR)

79

100

76

CMR, complete metabolic response; PMR, partial metabolic response; ORR, overall response rate.
*Adapted from Carlo-Stella et al.1 and Hutchings et al.2

Safety1,2

  • The most common adverse events (AEs) were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (67%), neutropenia (42%), and pyrexia (39%).
  • CRS was frequently Grade 1 or 2 and confined to Cycle 1 and 2 (Figure 2).
  • Treatment-related discontinuation was reported in two patients, one due to Grade 4 neutropenia and the other due to Grade 4 colitis (Table 3).

Figure 1. CRS by dose and cycle* 

CRS, cytokine release syndrome; C, cycle; D, day.
*Adapted from Carlo-Stella et al.1
Multiple occurrences of CRS are counted to the highest grade.

Table 3. Adverse events*

AE, %

All patients
(n = 52)

Any AEs

98

              Treatment-related

90

Serious AEs

62

              Treatment-related

56

Grade 3−4 AEs

60

              Treatment-related

40

Grade 5 AEs

0

AEs leading to treatment discontinuation

4

              Treatment-related

4

AE, adverse event.
*Adapted from Carlo-Stella et al.1 and Hutchings et al.2
Treatment-related discontinuation was reported in two patients.

Pharmacodynamics

  • Baseline tumor biopsies revealed that clinical responses with SUD of glofitamab were attained across a range of CD20 expression levels in 32 patients and irrespective of the amount of tumor T-cell infiltration in 24 patients.
  • There were no significant differences between the response categories.

Conclusion

The updated analysis showed that SUD of glofitamab had early, high, and durable response rates in patients with aNHL and iNHL who were refractory to multiple lines of therapy. Durability of responses was enhanced after completion of the fixed treatment period. The safety profile of SUD of glofitamab was manageable with mostly low-grade AEs confined to either Cycle 1 or 2.

  1. Carlo-Stella C, Hutchings M, Offner F, et al. Glofitamab step-up dosing (SUD): Updated efficacy data show high complete response rates in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients (PTS). E-poster #EP501. EHA2021; June 2021; Virtual.
  2. Hutchings M, Morschhauser F, Iacoboni G, et al. Glofitamab, a novel, bivalent CD20-targeting T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, induces durable complete remissions in relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma: A phase I trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1959-1970. DOI: 1200/JCO.20.03175

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox