The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
Question 1 of 1
Which treatment group from the CheckMate 205 clinical trial reported the highest rate of complete remission?
A
B
C
D
Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have a poor prognosis after an initial treatment with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) with an overall survival (OS) of approximately 2 years. Initial data from the CheckMate 205 (NCT02181738) trial demonstrated good efficacy and safety with nivolumab after auto-HSCT. The Lymphoma Hub has previously summarized 2-year follow-up data from the CheckMate 205 trial. Below, we present the extended 5-year follow-up data to understand long-term outcomes after nivolumab administration.
This is a phase II trial of nivolumab in patients with R/R cHL who had failed previous treatment with auto-HSCT. Full details of the study design are previously summarized on the Lymphoma Hub. Eligible patients were:
The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, complete remission (CR), partial remission rate and duration of CR and partial remission. Exploratory endpoints included progression-free survival, best overall response OS, and safety.
In total, 243 patients were treated in cohort A (n = 63), cohort B (n = 80) and cohort C (n = 100). At a median follow-up of 58.5 months:
Table 1. Responses between cohorts A, B and C.*
Auto-HSCT, autologous stem hematopoietic cell transplantation; BOR, best overall response; BV, brentuximab vedotin; CR, complete remission; DoR, duration of response; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease. *Adapted from Ansell SM, et al.1 |
||||
Response, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Cohort A (BV-naive) (n = 63) |
Cohort B (BV after auto-HSCT) (n = 80) |
Cohort C (BV before and/or after auto-HSCT) (n = 100) |
Overall (N=243)
|
---|---|---|---|---|
ORR |
65.1 |
71.3 |
71.2 |
71.2 |
BOR |
||||
CR |
31.7 |
13.8 |
21 |
21.4 |
PR |
33.3 |
57.5 |
54 |
49.8 |
SD |
22.2 |
17.5 |
12 |
16.5 |
PD |
12.7 |
8.8 |
11 |
10.7 |
Median time to response, months |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
Median time to CR, months |
3.9 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
Median DoR, months |
26.2 |
16.6 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
Received subsequent allogeneic HCT |
22.4 |
24.1 |
51.7 |
23.9 |
Figure 1. The most common (≥10% occurrence in patients) TRAEs reported*
TRAEs, treatment related adverse events.
*Adapted from Ansell SM, et al.1
The 5-year follow-up data from CheckMate 205 trial are consistent with the previously reported 18 and 33 months results. Nivolumab showed durable outcomes in patients with cHL who were R/R after auto-HSCT, and no new safety signals were identified. This study also provides evidence that patients may discontinue treatment one year after CR and restart treatment if cHL progresses.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content