All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Bookmark this article
On January 17, 2025, it was announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval to acalabrutinib, a second-generation BTK inhibitor, in combination with chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).1 This approval was based on positive results from the phase III ECHO trial (NCT02972840).1
ECHO is a randomized, double-blind, placebo (Pbo)-controlled, multicenter phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib (A) in combination with bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R) in patients with previously untreated MCL. Data presented during the European Hematology Association 2024 Hybrid Congress showed that among the evaluable patients with MCL (n = 598):
The trial met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS).
With a median follow-up of 45 months, PFS was 66.4 months vs 49.6 months in the A+B+R vs Pbo+B+R arms (p = 0.0160).
Overall response rates were 91% (complete response, 66.6%) vs 88% (complete response, 53.5%) in the A+B+R vs Pbo+B+R arms.
Overall survival was not reached in either arm (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–1.13; p = 0.2743).
Grade ≥3 adverse events were comparable between the A+B+R and Pbo+B+R arms, and adverse events of clinical interest were atrial fibrillation (3.7% vs 1.7%), hypertension (5.4% vs 8.4%) major bleeding (2% vs 3.4%), and infections (41.1% vs 34%).
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox