All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ECHO trial: Acalabrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab for newly diagnosed older patients with MCL

By Abhilasha Verma

Share:

Jul 22, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in mantle cell lymphoma.



Results from the phase III ECHO trial (NCT02972840) of acalabrutinib (A) plus bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R) vs placebo (Pbo) plus B and R in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) were presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2024 Hybrid Congress by Michael Wang.1


Key learnings:

The phase III ECHO trial met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS).

With a median follow-up of 45 months (mo), the PFS was 66.4 mo vs 49.6 mo in the A+B+R and Pbo+B+R arms, respectively (p = 0.0160).

Overall response rates were 91% (complete response [CR], 66.6%) vs 88% (CR, 53.5%) in the A+B+R and Pbo+B+R arms, respectively.

Overall survival (OS) was not reached in the A+B+R or Pbo+B+R arms (HR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.13; p = 0.2743).

The safety profile of A+B+R was consistent with that of the individual agents.

Gr ≥3 AEs were comparable between A+B+R and Pbo+B+R arms, and AEs of clinical interest were:

  • atrial fibrillation: 3.7% vs 1.7%;
  • hypertension: 5.4% vs 8.4%;
  • major bleeding: 2% vs 3.4%; and
  • infections: 41.1% vs 34%, respectively.

The ECHO trial results suggest that addition of A to B+R could improve outcomes for older patients with newly diagnosed MCL when given as a frontline therapy.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What types of support services or resources do you think would best facilitate the safe implementation of the BrECADD regimen in clinical practice?