All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) whose salvage therapy has failed have a poor prognosis. Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, which has shown effectiveness in B-cell malignancies, could be a valid alternative for HL treatment.
A phase I study, evaluating the safety of anti-CD30 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with HL, reported that the infusion of CD30-targeting CAR T cells (CD30.CAR-Ts) with no previous lymphodepleting chemotherapy was well tolerated, but resulted in only a 33% overall response rate (ORR).1 Two parallel phase I/II trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the autologous CD30.CAR-Ts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with R/R HL. The results of these studies were recently published by Carlos Ramos and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.2
The two parallel phase I/II trials enrolled patients with R/R CD30+ HL who relapsed after ≥ 2 lines of therapy. Patients were enrolled at two centers: the University of North Carolina (UNC, NCT02690545; n = 28) and the Baylor College of Medicine (BCM, NCT02917083; n = 28). Bridging chemotherapy was allowed before lymphodepletion. Of the 28 patients enrolled at UNC, 25 were treated. Of the 28 patients enrolled at BCM, 17 were treated, including one patient that was previously treated at UNC.
The treatment scheme is reported in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Treatment scheme2
BCM, Baylor College of Medicine; benda, bendamustine; Cy, cyclophosphamide; DL, dose level; flu, fludarabine; UNC, University of North Carolina.The primary endpoint for both studies was safety. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival (OS), and expansion and persistence of CD30.CAR-Ts in the peripheral blood after infusion.
Baseline patient characteristics are reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics2
allo-SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplantation; auto-SCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; benda, bendamustine; BV, brentuximab vedotin; CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; Cy, cyclophosphamide; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; flu, fludarabine; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; MC, mixed cellularity; NOS, not otherwise specified; NS, nodular sclerosis. *Both treatments are included for the patient who was treated twice. |
||||
Characteristic |
All patients (N = 42)* |
Benda (n = 8)* |
Benda-flu (n = 17) |
Cy-flu (n = 17)* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Median age, years (range) |
35 (17─69) |
49 (23─67) |
32 (23─45) |
36 (17─69) |
HL subtype, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
NS |
32 (76) |
6 (75) |
10 (59) |
16 (94) |
MC |
4 (10) |
2 (25) |
2 (12) |
0 (0) |
NOS |
6 (14) |
0 (0) |
5 (29) |
1 (6) |
Stage at disease, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
I─II |
14 (33) |
1 (13) |
7 (41) |
6 (35) |
III─IV |
28 (67) |
7 (88) |
10 (59) |
11 (65) |
ECOG PS ≥ 1, n (%) |
34 (81) |
5 (63) |
12 (71) |
17 (100) |
Median number of prior therapies (range) |
7 (2─23) |
7.5 (5─17) |
8 (3─23) |
5 (2─10) |
Bridging therapy, n (%) |
28 (67) |
8 (100) |
10 (59) |
10 (59) |
Prior BV, n (%) |
38 (90) |
8 (100) |
16 (94) |
14 (82) |
Prior CPI, n (%) |
34 (81) |
7 (88) |
13 (76) |
14 (82) |
Prior auto-SCT, n (%) |
32 (76) |
7 (88) |
14 (82) |
11 (65) |
Prior allo-SCT, n (%) |
10 (24) |
2 (25) |
8 (47) |
0 (0) |
The treatment was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities associated with CD30.CAR-T infusions observed. The most common ≥ Grade 3 adverse events are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events2
Benda, bendamustine; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; Cy, cyclophosphamide; flu, fludarabine. *Both treatments are included for the patient who was treated twice. |
||||
Adverse event, n (%) |
All patients (N = 42)* |
Benda (n = 8)* |
Benda-flu (n = 17) |
Cy-flu (n = 17)* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lymphopenia |
42 (100) |
8 (100) |
17 (100) |
17 (100) |
Leukopenia |
24 (57) |
3 (38) |
8 (47) |
13 (76) |
Rash (any grade) |
20 (48) |
2 (25) |
4 (24) |
14 (82) |
Neutropenia |
20 (48) |
2 (25) |
7 (41) |
11 (65) |
Thrombocytopenia |
11 (26) |
1 (13) |
7 (41) |
3 (18) |
Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia not resolved by Day 28 |
10 (24) |
0 (0) |
7 (41) |
3 (18) |
CRS (all Grade 1) |
10 (24) |
1 (13) |
2 (12) |
7 (41) |
In total, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 24% of patients, all of which were Grade 1 with a median onset of 10 days (range, 7─24) and a median duration of 4 days (range, 1─6). All the CRS events resolved spontaneously without the need for tocilizumab or corticosteroids.
Neurologic toxicity was not observed.
Clinical responses were evaluated in 37 patients with measurable disease at the time of treatment, and rates are reported in Table 3. In patients who received flu-based lymphodepletion, the ORR was 72% (n = 32), with 59% of patients (n = 19) achieving a complete response (CR).
Table 3. Clinical responses2
Benda, bendamustine; CR, complete response; Cy, cyclophosphamide; flu, fludarabine; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. |
||||
Response |
All patients (n = 37) |
Benda (n = 5) |
Benda-flu (n = 15) |
Cy-flu (n = 17) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ORR, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
CR + PR |
23 (62) |
0 (0) |
12 (80) |
11 (65) |
Response rate, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
CR |
19 (51) |
0 (0) |
11 (73) |
8 (47) |
PR |
4 (11) |
0 (0) |
1 (7) |
3 (18) |
SD |
4 (11) |
1 (20) |
1 (7) |
2 (11) |
PD |
10 (27) |
4 (80) |
2 (13) |
4 (24) |
After a median follow-up of 533 days:
In patients receiving flu-based lymphodepletion, the peak of CD30.CAR-T expansion was observed in the first 2─3 weeks after infusion.
CD30.CAR-Ts persistence was cell-dose dependent, with a higher persistence in patients receiving 2 × 108 CAR-Ts/m2 than in patients receiving 2 × 107 CAR-Ts/m2 or 1 × 108 CAR-Ts/m2 (p < 0.001), irrespective of the lymphodepleting regimen used.
In a heavily pre-treated population of patients with R/R HL, the infusion of autologous CD30.CAR-Ts after flu-based lymphodepletion was well tolerated, with a high rate of durable responses. These promising results highlight the feasibility of CAR T-cell therapies in HL, providing a potential new therapeutic option that could be further investigated for its use in both later and earlier stages of the disease.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox