All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2020-09-04T13:55:05.000Z

Anti-CD30 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with heavily pretreated R/R HL

Sep 4, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) whose salvage therapy has failed have a poor prognosis. Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, which has shown effectiveness in B-cell malignancies, could be a valid alternative for HL treatment.

A phase I study, evaluating the safety of anti-CD30 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with HL, reported that the infusion of CD30-targeting CAR T cells (CD30.CAR-Ts) with no previous lymphodepleting chemotherapy was well tolerated, but resulted in only a 33% overall response rate (ORR).1 Two parallel phase I/II trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the autologous CD30.CAR-Ts after lymphodepleting chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with R/R HL. The results of these studies were recently published by Carlos Ramos and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.2

Study design2

The two parallel phase I/II trials enrolled patients with R/R CD30+ HL who relapsed after ≥ 2 lines of therapy. Patients were enrolled at two centers: the University of North Carolina (UNC, NCT02690545; n = 28) and the Baylor College of Medicine (BCM, NCT02917083; n = 28). Bridging chemotherapy was allowed before lymphodepletion. Of the 28 patients enrolled at UNC, 25 were treated. Of the 28 patients enrolled at BCM, 17 were treated, including one patient that was previously treated at UNC.

Treatment schedule

  • Lymphodepletion
    • At UNC: Bendamustine (benda) 90mg/m2/day for two days for the first cohort (n = 8), and benda 70 mg/m2/day plus fludarabine (flu) 30 mg/m2/day for 3 days for the second cohort.
    • At BCM: Cyclophosphamide (Cy) 500 mg/m2/day and flu 30 mg/m2/day for 3 days.
  • Patients received CD30.CAR-T infusion 2–5 days after lymphodepletion:
    • At BCM, patients received either 2 × 107 CAR T cells/m2 (dose level [DL] 1), 1 × 108 CAR T cells/m2 (DL2), or 2 × 108 CAR T cells/m2 (DL3).
    • At UNC, patients received 1 × 108 CAR T cells/m2 (DL 2) or 2 × 108 CAR T cells/m2 (DL3).
  • In patients with stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) after the first treatment, a second infusion was allowed.

The treatment scheme is reported in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Treatment scheme2

BCM, Baylor College of Medicine; benda, bendamustine; Cy, cyclophosphamide; DL, dose level; flu, fludarabine; UNC, University of North Carolina. 

Endpoints

The primary endpoint for both studies was safety. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival (OS), and expansion and persistence of CD30.CAR-Ts in the peripheral blood after infusion.

Results2

Patient characteristics

Baseline patient characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics2

allo-SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplantation; auto-SCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; benda, bendamustine; BV, brentuximab vedotin; CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; Cy, cyclophosphamide; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; flu, fludarabine; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; MC, mixed cellularity; NOS, not otherwise specified; NS, nodular sclerosis.

*Both treatments are included for the patient who was treated twice.

 

Characteristic

All patients

(N = 42)*

Benda

(n = 8)*

Benda-flu

(n = 17)

Cy-flu

(n = 17)*

Median age, years (range)

35 (17─69)

49 (23─67)

32 (23─45)

36 (17─69)

HL subtype, n (%)

 

 

 

 

NS

32 (76)

6 (75)

10 (59)

16 (94)

MC

4 (10)

2 (25)

2 (12)

0 (0)

NOS

6 (14)

0 (0)

5 (29)

1 (6)

Stage at disease, n (%)

 

 

 

 

I─II

14 (33)

1 (13)

7 (41)

6 (35)

III─IV

28 (67)

7 (88)

10 (59)

11 (65)

ECOG PS ≥ 1, n (%)

34 (81)

5 (63)

12 (71)

17 (100)

Median number of prior therapies (range)

7 (2─23)

7.5 (5─17)

8 (3─23)

5 (2─10)

Bridging therapy, n (%)

28 (67)

8 (100)

10 (59)

10 (59)

Prior BV, n (%)

38 (90)

8 (100)

16 (94)

14 (82)

Prior CPI, n (%)

34 (81)

7 (88)

13 (76)

14 (82)

Prior auto-SCT, n (%)

32 (76)

7 (88)

14 (82)

11 (65)

Prior allo-SCT, n (%)

10 (24)

2 (25)

8 (47)

0 (0)

Safety

The treatment was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities associated with CD30.CAR-T infusions observed. The most common ≥ Grade 3 adverse events are reported in Table 2.

Table 2. Most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events2

Benda, bendamustine; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; Cy, cyclophosphamide; flu, fludarabine.

*Both treatments are included for the patient who was treated twice.

 

Adverse event, n (%)

All patients

(N = 42)*

Benda

(n = 8)*

Benda-flu

(n = 17)

Cy-flu

(n = 17)*

Lymphopenia

42 (100)

8 (100)

17 (100)

17 (100)

Leukopenia

24 (57)

3 (38)

8 (47)

13 (76)

Rash (any grade)

20 (48)

2 (25)

4 (24)

14 (82)

Neutropenia

20 (48)

2 (25)

7 (41)

11 (65)

Thrombocytopenia

11 (26)

1 (13)

7 (41)

3 (18)

Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia not resolved by Day 28

10 (24)

0 (0)

7 (41)

3 (18)

CRS (all Grade 1)

10 (24)

1 (13)

2 (12)

7 (41)

In total, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 24% of patients, all of which were Grade 1 with a median onset of 10 days (range, 7─24) and a median duration of 4 days (range, 1─6). All the CRS events resolved spontaneously without the need for tocilizumab or corticosteroids.

Neurologic toxicity was not observed.

Efficacy

Clinical responses were evaluated in 37 patients with measurable disease at the time of treatment, and rates are reported in Table 3. In patients who received flu-based lymphodepletion, the ORR was 72% (n = 32), with 59% of patients (n = 19) achieving a complete response (CR).

Table 3. Clinical responses2

Benda, bendamustine; CR, complete response; Cy, cyclophosphamide; flu, fludarabine; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

 

Response

All patients

(n = 37)

Benda

(n = 5)

Benda-flu

(n = 15)

Cy-flu

(n = 17)

ORR, n (%)

 

 

 

 

CR + PR

23 (62)

0 (0)

12 (80)

11 (65)

Response rate, n (%)

 

 

 

 

CR

19 (51)

0 (0)

11 (73)

8 (47)

PR

4 (11)

0 (0)

1 (7)

3 (18)

SD

4 (11)

1 (20)

1 (7)

2 (11)

PD

10 (27)

4 (80)

2 (13)

4 (24)

After a median follow-up of 533 days:

  • 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) in 37 evaluable patients was 36% (95% CI, 21─51), with longer PFS in patients receiving a flu-based conditioning than in patients receiving benda alone (p = 0.0002).
  • Median PFS for the 19 patients who achieved CR was 444 days.
  • 1-year OS for all 41 patients (counting the one patient treated at both sites only once) was 94% (95% CI, 79─99).

CAR-T cell expansion and persistence

In patients receiving flu-based lymphodepletion, the peak of CD30.CAR-T expansion was observed in the first 2─3 weeks after infusion.

CD30.CAR-Ts persistence was cell-dose dependent, with a higher persistence in patients receiving 2 × 108 CAR-Ts/m2 than in patients receiving 2 × 107 CAR-Ts/m2 or 1 × 108 CAR-Ts/m2 (p < 0.001), irrespective of the lymphodepleting regimen used.

Conclusion

In a heavily pre-treated population of patients with R/R HL, the infusion of autologous CD30.CAR-Ts after flu-based lymphodepletion was well tolerated, with a high rate of durable responses. These promising results highlight the feasibility of CAR T-cell therapies in HL, providing a potential new therapeutic option that could be further investigated for its use in both later and earlier stages of the disease.

  1. Ramos CA, Ballard B, Zhang H, et al. Clinical and immunological responses after CD30-specific chimeric antigen receptor-redirected lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3462-3471. DOI: 10.1172/JCI94306
  2. Ramos CA, Grover NS, Beaven AW, et al. Anti-CD30 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;JCO2001342. DOI: 1200/JCO.20.01342

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox