TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Autologous transplant in follicular lymphoma after treatment failure

By Devona Williams

Share:

Feb 22, 2018


Carla Casulo of the Wilmont Cancer Institute and colleagues completed a multicenter study comparing outcomes in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients with early treatment failure after frontline rituximab-based chemotherapy, who received autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) and those who did not.  The study findings were published online on December 11, 2017, in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

An earlier study by Casulo showed that patients with FL who have disease progression or do not achieve a partial response, within the first 2 years after treatment have a much worse survival prognosis. The goal of this study was to determine if high dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT will improve overall survival (OS) in patients who have early treatment failure. 

Patient Population

  • N = 349 total patients
    • Non-SCT = 174 patients
    • SCT = 175 patients
  • Median age: non-SCT = 55 years vs SCT = 53 years
  • Median time from diagnosis to SCT = 23 months
  • Complete remission (CR)/partial remission (PR) after frontline therapy: non-SCT = 67% vs SCT = 78%

Key Findings

  • Five-year OS: non-SCT = 60% (95% CI, 52%-67%) vs SCT = 67% (95% CI, 60%-75%), P = 0.25
  • SCT did not influence OS in multivariate analysis
    • OS SCT: HR = 0.88 (95% CI, 0.61-1.26), P = 0.49
  • Age >60 years associated with decreased OS in multivariate analysis
    • Age >60 mortality: HR = 2.49 (95% CI, 1.18-5.25) P = 0.02
  • Subgroup analysis of SCT within 1 year of treatment failure (early SCT)
    • Two-year OS: non-SCT = 76% (95% CI, 69%-82%) vs SCT = 84% (95% CI, 79%-90%), P = 0.011
    • Five-year OS: non-SCT = 60% (95% CI, 52%-67%) vs SCT = 73% (95% CI, 66%-81%), P = 0.05

The results of this study advocate consideration of autologous SCT for FL patients who have early treatment failure, following frontline rituximab-based chemotherapy. The analysis of SCT within the first year after treatment failure supports a survival advantage in this cohort of patients.

References