TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Bortezomib plus R-CHOP for distinct molecular DLBCL subtypes: Results from the phase III trial REMoDL-B

By Sylvia Agathou

Share:

Apr 19, 2019


On 5 April 2019, Andrew Davies from the University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, and colleagues, published in the Lancet Oncology results from the phase III clinical trial REMoDL-B (randomised evaluation of molecular guided therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with bortezomib; NCT01324596).

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, adaptive, superiority, phase III trial, the efficacy of bortezomib addition to standard chemoimmunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was investigated. Initially, all patients received one cycle of standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) treatment. Following that, gene-expression analysis was undertaken, patients were stratified by molecular DLBCL subtype (germinal center B-cell [GCB], activated B-cell [ABC], or unclassified) and further randomized to continue R-CHOP alone or with the addition of bortezomib. The primary endpoint of the study was 30-month progression-free survival (PFS) for the GCB and ABC populations. Secondary endpoints included, 30-month PFS according to cell-of-origin subgroup, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), response rates and duration, and toxicity.

Study design & baseline characteristics

  • N = 918 patients with previously untreated, histologically-confirmed DLBCL, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, and bulky stage I or disease stage II−IV,
  • Molecular DLBCL subtypes:
    • ABC: 26.6% of patients (n = 244)
    • GCB: 51.7% of patients (n = 475)
    • Unclassified: 21.7% of patients (n = 199)
  • All patients initially received one 21-day R-CHOP cycle and then were randomly 1:1 assigned to R-CHOP or R-CHOP plus bortezomib (RB-CHOP) as below:
    • R-CHOP (n = 459; five additional 21-day cycles):
      • R: 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on Day 1
      • C: 750 mg/m2 IV on Day 1
      • H: 50 mg/m2 IV on Day 1
      • O: 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) IV on Day 1
      • P: 100 mg orally once daily on Days 1−5
    • RB-CHOP (n = 459; five 21-day cycles):
      • R-CHOP as above
      • Bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m2 IV or 1.6 mg/m2 subcutaneously on Days 1 and 8 for cycles 2−6
    • Further treatment cycles were given when patient neutrophils had recovered to 1.0 × 109/L and platelets to 100 × 109/L
  • Primary analysis on the  modified intention-to-treat (mITT) populations comprising the GCB and ABC subgroups
  • Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the R-CHOP and RB-CHOP arms:

DLBCL molecular subtype

R-CHOP arm, n (%)

RB-CHOP arm, n (%)

Activated B cell

121 (26·4%)

123 (26.8%)

Germinal centre B cell

240 (52·3%)

235 (51.2%)

Unclassified

98 (21.4%)

101 (22.0%)

 Key findings

  • The following statistically significant clinical differences between molecular DLBCL subgroups were observed:

 

ABC subgroup
(n = 244)

GCB subgroup
(n = 475)

Unclassified subgroup
(n = 199)

P value
(ABC vs GCB)

Age, years

67 (22–86)

63 (20–82)

63 (20–84)

0.0045

Bone marrow involvement

33/240 (13.8%)

66/465 (14.2%)

42/191 (22.0%)

0.017

Bulky disease >10 cm

50/241 (20.7%)

158/467 (33.8%)

55/198 (27.8%)

< 0.0001

  • Nineteen patients were identified with primary mediastinal lymphoma. Of those, 74% (n = 14) had been allocated to the GCB group and 26% (n = 5) to the unclassified group
  • After a median follow-up of 30 months:
    • 30-month PFS rates:
      • R-CHOP: 70.1% (95% CI, 65.0−7)
      • RB-CHOP: 74.3% (95% CI, 69.3−7)
      • Comparison: HR = 0.86; (95% CI, 0.65−1.13); P = 0.28
        • Adjusted HR = 0.84; (95% CI, 0.64−1.11); P = 0.23
      • OS events (i.e. deaths):
        • R-CHOP: 62 events
        • RB-CHOP: 54 events
      • 30-month OS rates:
        • R-CHOP: 82.7% (95% CI, 78.2−3)
        • RB-CHOP: 83.6% (95% CI, 79.0−3)
        • Comparison: HR = 0.89; (95% CI, 0.62−1.28); P = 0.52
          • Adjusted HR = 0.85; (95% CI, 0.59−1.23); P = 0.40
        • After a median follow-up of 42.3 months:
          • 30-month PFS rates:
            • R-CHOP: 70.6% (95% CI, 65.5−0)
            • RB-CHOP: 75.2% (95% CI, 70.3−4)
            • Comparison: adjusted HR = 0.82; (95% CI, 0.63−1.08); P = 0.16
          • Secondary analysis by DLBCL molecular subtype revealed that bortezomib did not significantly affect PFS in the ABC (adjusted HR = 0.78, [95% CI, 0.51–1.21]; P = 0.27), GCB (HR = 0.85, 95% CI, [0·60–1.20]; P = 0.35), or unclassified patient subgroup (HR = 1.29, [95% CI, 0.77–2.16]; P = 0.34)

Safety

  • Bortezomib was generally well tolerated, with the most common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) being (R-CHOP vs RB-CHOP):
    • Hematological toxicity (39.8% vs 1%)
  • No significant increase in the proportion of patients with Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or anemia was observed in the RB-CHOP group as compared to the R-CHOP arm
  • Any grade neuropathy was more frequently observed in the RB-CHOP (56.8%) versus the R-CHOP arm (41.6%; P< 0.0001)
  • Serious adverse events:
    • R-CHOP: 42.5% (n = 190/447)
    • RB-CHOP: 50.2% (n = 223/444)
  • Deaths in the safety population:
    • R-CHOP: 16.3% (n = 73/447)
    • RB-CHOP: 15·3% (n = 68/444)
  • Reason of death:
    • Progressive lymphoma:
      • R-CHOP: 68·5% (n = 50/73)
      • RB-CHOP: 79·4% (n = 54/68)
    • Treatment-related:
      • R-CHOP: 6.8% (n = 5/73)
      • RB-CHOP: 9% (n = 4/68)
    • In the ITT population, dose reductions of any treatment drug were less frequent in the R-CHOP arm (34.5%), when compared to the RB-CHOP group (42.9%)

Conclusion

This multicenter phase III trial with real-time DLBCL molecular characterisation showed that bortezomib addition to R-CHOP did not improve PFS in patients with DLBCL, despite their molecular subtype (ABC, GCB or unclassified).

References