The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lym content recommended for you
Cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19)-directed immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells and bispecific T-cell engagers (BITEs) are known to be clinically effective in treating B-cell malignancies, but they are also known to cause a high incidence of neurotoxicity. Therefore, exploring the etiologies of CAR T-cell toxicities affecting patient outcomes is an important area of investigation.
In a recently published study in Cell, Parker et al.1 used multimethod analyses on several datasets including single-cell ribonucleic acid sequencing (scRNA-seq) of human brain cells to potentially identify causes of neurotoxicity following immunotherapy using CD19-targeted CARs.
As CAR T-cell therapy is at the therapeutic forefront in treating leukemia and lymphoma, it is crucial to understand the risks and benefits of these treatments for patients. This study adds to the understanding of the biology of CAR T-cells in patients and provides a strong stimulus for further investigating the potential targeting of mural cells by CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapies, in order to develop therapies with improved safety profiles.
The findings of this study are aligned with previously established principles on the response to CAR T-cell therapy and neurotoxicity. However, the study does have several limitations, as it did not determine the precise contributions of mural cell death and cytokine release syndrome in this process, and it did not investigate whether there were interpatient differences in mural cell frequency and/or CD19 expression. Also, neurovascular cell heterogeneity and long-term effects associated with the targeting of mural cells was not analyzed.
The study highlights the need for developing a comprehensive human single-cell gene expression atlas for clinical medicine. Rare cell types might be easily missed in measurements of bulk tissue due to their low frequency, but as this study demonstrates, they could be critically important in understanding the clinical effects of targeted therapies.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content