All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

2021-07-04T13:41:13.000Z

CD20-directed CAR T-cell therapies in the treatment of relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Results from two phase I trials

Jul 4, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

CD20 is an effective therapeutic target for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), and the CD20-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, C-CAR066, has demonstrated high in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. C-CAR039 is a novel second generation 4-1BB bispecific CAR T-cell therapy targeting both CD19 and CD20 antigens, and it similarly shows high antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo. At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Aibin Liang presented initial findings from two trials, one evaluating C-CAR066 (NCT04036019)1 and the other evaluating C-CAR039 (NCT04317885)2.The key findings are presented here.

Study designs1,2

  • A phase I, first-in-human, open-label trial of C-CAR066 was conducted in two sites in China, in patients aged ≥18 years and with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-NHL after failing CD19 CAR T-cell therapy.
  • A phase I, open-label, dose escalation trial of C-CAR039 was conducted in four sites in China, in patients ≥18 years with R/R B-NHL, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma.
  • Patients were given C-CAR066 or C-CAR039 infusion, as shown in Figure 1.
  • For both trials, primary endpoints were incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival, and exploratory endpoints were CAR T cell expansion and persistence.

Figure 1. Treatment schema*  

CY, cyclophosphamide; FLU, fludarabine.
*Adapted from Liang, et al.1,2
Bridging therapy was permitted.

 Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics for the patients included in the C-CAR0661 and C-CAR0392 trials are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics*

Characteristic

C-CAR066 anti-CD20 CAR T-cell therapy
(N = 10)

C-CAR039 anti-CD20/CD19 bispecific CAR T-cell therapy
(N = 28)

Median age (range), years

55.5 (41–67)

55.5 (28–71)

Male sex, %

50

68

NHL subtype, %

 

 

              DLBCL, NOS

80

89

              tFL

20

4

              PMBCL

0

4

              FL

0

4

ECOG PS, %

 

 

              0

10

64

              1

90

36

IPI score 3–4/5, %

60

25

Ann Arbor stage III/IV, %

90

75

Double-expressor lymphoma, %

40

29

Median number of prior lines of therapy (range)

5 (2–6)

3 (1–5)

Number of prior lines of therapy, %

 

 

              2

10

4

              3

0

36

              4

30

14

              5

40

25

              6

20

21

Prior therapies, %

 

 

              ASCT

20

18

              BTK inhibitor

20

29

              Lenalidomide

60

32

Best response to prior CAR T-cell therapy, %

 

 

              CR

20

NA

              PR

80

NA

Median DOR of prior CAR T-cell therapy (range)

2.1 (0.7–12.6)

NA

Bridging therapy, %

40

18

ASCT, autologous stem cell transplant; BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CR, complete response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DOR, duration of response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FL, follicular lymphoma; IPI, International Prognostic Index; NA, not applicable; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NOS, not otherwise specified; PMBCL, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma; PR, partial response; tFL, transformed follicular lymphoma.
*Adapted from Liang et al.1,2

Results

C-CAR066 anti-CD20 CAR T-cell therapy1

Safety

  • In total, eight patients (80%) had Grade 1–2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and one patient (10%) had Grade 4 CRS. The median days to onset and to resolution of CRS were 2 days (range, 1–9 days) and 4 days (range, 2–17 days), respectively.
  • Adverse events (AEs) of Grade ≥3 included neutropenia (80%), anemia (50%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and infections (10%).
  • Cytopenias were mostly related to cyclophosphamide/fludarabine lymphodepletion and were reversible.
  • No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in any of the patients.

Efficacy

  • Patients demonstrated an ORR of 100% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 70%. The median time to complete response (CR) was 2.7 months (range, 0.9–2.9 months) (Table 2).
  • Four patients remained in CR after 10 months.
  • C-CAR066 proliferation and expansion in the peripheral blood correlated with B-cell depletion.

Table 2. Response rates*

Response assessed by investigator

N = 10

ORR, %

100

              CRR

70

              PRR

30

Median time to response, months (range)

1.0 (0.9–2.7)

Median DOR, months (range)

NR

Median time to CR, months (range)

2.7 (0.9–2.9)

Median duration of CR, months (range)

NR

Median follow-up, months (range)

4.2 (1.2–11.7)

CR, complete response; CRR, complete response rate; DOR, duration of response; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; PRR, partial response rate.
*Adapted from Liang et al.1

C-CAR039 anti-CD20/CD19 bispecific CAR T-cell therapy2

Safety

  • In total, 93% of patients developed CRS, although only 4% of patients had Grade ≥3 CRS (Table 3).
  • Median days to onset and resolution of CRS were 2.5 days (range, 0–10 days) and 4 days (range, 1–25 days), respectively (Table 3). Shorter duration of CRS onset and longer duration of resolution were noted in higher dose groups.
  • ICANS occurred at Grade 1 in two patients; both were in the 5.0 × 106 CAR-T cell/kg dosing group (Table 3). Infections were common (54%), but Grade 3 infection only occurred in one patient.
  • Hematologic Grade ≥3 AEs included leukopenia (89%), neutropenia (89%), lymphopenia (96%), anemia (32%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and infection (4%).
  • Other Grade ≥3 AEs were infrequent and included hypertriglyceridemia (4%), hypokalemia (4%), increased alanine aminotransferase (7%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (7%).

Table 3. CRS and ICANS in patients treated with different doses of C-CAR039

Variable

All
(N = 28)

1.0 × 106/kg
(n = 4)

2.5 × 106/kg
(n = 15)

5.0 × 106/kg
(n = 9)

CRS

Median days to onset (range)

2.5 (0–10)

7 (2–10)

3.5 (1–10)

1 (0–9)

Median days to resolution (range)

4 (1–25)

2.5 (1–7)

4.5 (1–25)

4 (1–7)

CRS, %

 

 

 

 

              Any grade

93

100

93

89

              Grade ≥3

4

0

7

0

Most common symptoms of any grade, %

 

 

 

 

              Pyrexia

100

100

100

100

              Hypotension

23

25

29

13

              Hypoxemia

0

0

0

0

CRS management, %

 

 

 

 

              Tocilizumab alone

14

0

13

22

              Corticosteroids alone

4

0

7

0

              Tocilizumab and corticosteroids

4

0

7

0

ICANS

Median days to onset (range)

16 (4–28)

NA

NA

16 (4–28)

Median days to resolution (range)

31.5 (11–52)

NA

NA

31.5 (11–52)

Neurologic events, %

 

 

 

 

              Any grade

7

0

0

22

              Grade ≥3

0

0

0

0

Most common symptoms of any grade, %

 

 

 

 

              Tremor

100

0

0

100

              Confusion

0

0

0

0

ICANS management, %

 

 

 

 

              Corticosteroids

4

NA

NA

11

              Tocilizumab

0

NA

NA

0

CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

*Adapted from Liang et al.2

Efficacy

  • A total of 27 patients were evaluable for investigator-assessed efficacy. For the overall patient cohort, CRR was 85% and ORR was 93%. Patients with DLBCL had a 92% ORR and an 83% CRR.
  • Median time to first response was 1 month (range, 0.9–1.6 months), and median time to CR was 1 month (range, 0.9-6.0 months).
  • CRR was consistent across key subgroups.
  • Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 1.9–17.2 months) and the progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 83% (95% confidence interval, 69–100). Median duration of response was not reached.
  • C-CAR039 proliferation and expansion in the peripheral blood correlated with B-cell depletion.

Conclusion

The novel anti-CD20 CAR T-cell therapy, C-CAR066, demonstrated a favorable safety profile and encouraging clinical benefit in patients with R/R DLBCL following failure of CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy. Similarly, the anti-CD20/CD19 bispecific CAR T-cell therapy, C-CAR039, demonstrated a satisfactory safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with R/R B-NHL. However, the findings were limited by a small sample size in both studies. Further evaluation in more patients, with a longer follow-up, to confirm safety, efficacy, and duration of response is underway.

  1. Liang A, Ye S, Li P, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel anti-CD20 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) patients after failing CD19 CAR-T therapy. Oral abstract #2508. 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2021; Virtual.
  2. Liang A, Zhou L, Li P, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel anti-CD20/CD19 bi-specific CAR T-cell therapy (C-CAR039) in relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Oral abstract #2507. 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2021; Virtual.

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the Lymphoma Hub?
82 votes - 77 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox