All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Roche, Sobi, AbbVie, BeOne, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Thermo Fisher, Nurix Therapeutics and Caribou Biosciences and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lymphoma & CLL content recommended for you
Final analysis results from the randomized phase III CLL14 study (NCT02242942), evaluating fixed-duration venetoclax + obinutuzumab (Ven + Obi; n = 216) vs chlorambucil + obinutuzumab (Clb + Obi; n = 216) in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting medical conditions, were presented by Kirsten Fischer at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Key data: At a median observation time of 110.1 months, Ven + Obi demonstrated a median PFS of 76.6 months vs 37.9 months with Clb + Obi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.63; p < 0.001). Median time-to-next treatment (TTNT) was 91.9 vs 52.5 months (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43–0.70; p < 0.0001). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with Ven + Obi vs 112.7 months with Clb + Obi (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59–1.09; p = 0.161). End-of-treatment measurable residual disease (MRD) status remained prognostic for both PFS and OS. A higher incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) was observed with Ven + Obi vs Clb + Obi (2.6 vs 1.5 per 1,000 patient-months; p = 0.047).
Key learning: One-year fixed-duration Ven + Obi achieves durable long-term efficacy in previously untreated patients with CLL. The increased incidence of SPMs in the Ven + Obi arm warrants ongoing monitoring in long-term follow-up.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
In patients with R/R LBCL who progress after CAR‑T, which of the following data would most strengthen your confidence in considering BV+R2?