All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The lym Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lym Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lym and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene, Johnson & Johnson and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Lilly, and Pfizer. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CLL6 RESIDUUM trial: Impact of lenalidomide consolidation on HRQoL in CLL

By Sari Cumming

Share:

May 28, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in CLL.



The randomized phase III CLL6 RESIDUUM trial (ACTRN12610000060044) assessed the efficacy of lenalidomide (LEN) as consolidation therapy in patients with CLL, with MRD following classical immunochemotherapy treatment.1 While significant benefit with LEN was demonstrated in the final CLL6 RESIDUUM analysis, LEN supplementation was associated with severe AEs such as fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia.1

Wasse et al. conducted an ancillary study of the CLL6 RESIDUUM French cohort (N = 66), to assess HRQoL and PROs in patients receiving LEN (n = 32) vs observation (OBS; n = 34), using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).1 Findings from this analysis were published in BMC Cancer.1

 

Key learnings

At Month 12, significantly more patients receiving LEN consolidation therapy reported diarrhea than those in the OBS arm (p = 0.003), and social functioning was significantly impaired at Month 18 (p = 0.05) with LEN vs OBS. 

From Month 12 onwards, 10-point differences in mean EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were observed in the LEN arm for dyspnea and digestive disorders.

Multivariate analysis demonstrated a detrimental effect of LEN on global health (p = 0.02) and functional scales (p = 0.003) scores.

The deterioration in HRQoL associated with LEN vs OBS after 12 months of LEN treatment highlights the importance of assessing HRQoL as well as therapeutic benefit when treating patients with LEN as consolidation therapy for CLL.

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; EORTC QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; HRQoL, health‑related quality of life; LEN, lenalidomide; MRD, measurable residual disease; OBS, observation; PRO, patient-reported outcome.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content