All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, BeOne Medicines, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Nurix Therapeutics, Roche, Sobi, and Thermo Fisher Scientific and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Diagnosis and staging

By Cynthia Umukoro

Share:

Nov 14, 2016


According to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) should include an excision biopsy to assess the nodal architecture and provide adequate specimen for phenotypic and molecular studies. Needle core biopsy is only recommended in patients in whom a surgical approach is not possible or advised.1 Immunophenotypic investigations should provide a morphological diagnosis of DLBCL using immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry or both. EBER-1 staining is recommended to identify Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Diagnosis should be carried out according to the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification.1,2 Hepatitis B virus testing is included due to the risk of reactivation prior to treatment with CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Hepatitis C testing is required in high-risk patients and patients with splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma.3

Staging is done according to the Ann Arbor classification system (Table 1), although a new staging system has been proposed but has not yet been validated.4 

Table 1. Ann Arbor Classification1

Stage

 Description

I

Involvement of a single lymphatic region (I) or localized involvement of single extralymphatic organ or site (IE)

II

Involvement of two or more lymphatic regions on the same side of the diaphragm (II) or localized involvement of a single extralymphatic organ or site and of one or more lymphatic regions on the same side of the diaphragm (IIE)

III

Involvement of lymphatic regions on both sides of the diaphragm

IV

Diffuse or disseminated involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs with or without lymphatic involvement

 The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) should also be calculated for prognostic purposes (Table 2).

Table 2. IPI and estimated overall survival1,3

IPI1

Risk factors: Age >60 years; Serum LDH >normal; Stage III–IV; Performance status 2–4; Extranodal sites >1

Risk categories

Score

Estimated 3-year Overall Survival (95% CI)1

Low

0–1

91 (89–94)

Low intermediate

2

81 (73–86)

High intermediate

3

65 (58–73)

High

4–5

59 (49–69)

Age adjusted IPI (aaIPI) in patients ≤60 years1

Risk factors: Serum LDH >normal; Stage III–IV; Performance status 2–4

Risk categories

Score

Estimated 3-year Overall Survival (95% CI)3

Low

0

98 (96–100)

Low intermediate

1

92 (87–95)

High intermediate

2

75 (66–82)

High

3

75 (66–82)

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In your experience, what is the average time to secure a reimbursed CAR T-cell therapy manufacturing slot for patients with DLBCL (from decision to treatment with a CAR T-cell therapy)?