All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lymphoma & CLL Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Beigene and Roche, and supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company and Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC View funders.
Bookmark this article
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the United States (US) and Europe.1,2 Bridging therapy, defined as lymphoma therapy given between apheresis and the start of lymphodepleting chemotherapy, may be given to control a patient’s disease whilst awaiting manufacturing of the CAR T product. The impact of bridging therapy on subsequent patient outcomes is unknown. Bridging therapy was not permitted in the original ZUMA-1 study, which the axi-cel approvals are based on.3
During the 61st American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition, Michael D Jain, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, US, presented results from a study evaluating the impact of bridging therapy on patient outcome while awaiting axi-cel manufacturing, on behalf of the U.S. Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium, and co-first-author Miriam T Jacobs, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, US.3
The U.S. Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium comprises of 17 academic centers in the US that treat patients with R/R DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) with CAR T therapies. In this study, 298 patients were leukapheresed across all centers, with 23 not proceeding to CAR T infusion, predominantly due to lymphoma progression or death (n= 20). The axi-cel infusion was administered to 275 patients.
To determine if any covariates were associated with a poor OS, multivariate analysis was conducted. This showed several high-risk groups as demonstrated in Table 1, one of which was the use of bridging therapy (p= 0.03).
HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase |
|||
High-risk group |
HR |
95% CI |
p value |
---|---|---|---|
Male sex |
1.7 |
1.0–2.7 |
0.04 |
ECOG score 2–4 |
1.8 |
1.1–3.0 |
0.02 |
Primary refractory disease status |
1.9 |
1–3.6 |
0.04 |
Refractory disease status |
1.7 |
0.9–3.3 |
0.08 |
Total bilirubin > 1.5g/dl |
5.1 |
1.8–14.5 |
0.002 |
LDH level > upper limit of normal prior to conditioning |
3 |
1.7–5.4 |
0.0001 |
Bridging therapy given |
1.8 |
1.0–2.7 |
0.03 |
In this study, bridging therapy was given to 53% of patients (n= 158), most commonly chemotherapy (54%) followed by steroids only (23%), radiotherapy (12%) and targeted agents (10%). Of the patients receiving bridging therapy, 89% (n= 141) went on to receive the axi-cel infusion. This is in comparison to the 47% of patients who did not receive bridging therapy (n= 140), of whom 96% received the axi-cel infusion (n= 134).
Some baseline covariates of patients receiving bridging therapy were significantly different to those not receiving bridging therapy, as shown in Table 2.
IPI, international prognostic index; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase |
|||
Covariate |
No bridging, % |
Bridging, % |
p value |
---|---|---|---|
ECOG score 2–4 |
8 |
30 |
< 0.001 |
Stage III/IV disease |
75 |
89 |
< 0.001 |
IPI score 3–5 |
38 |
69 |
< 0.001 |
Bulky disease |
14 |
31 |
< 0.001 |
Did not meet ZUMA-1 eligibility criteria |
34 |
52 |
0.002 |
LDH < 200 IU/L at conditioning |
26 |
12 |
0.03 |
Given as no bridging vs bridging
Looking at toxicity and cause of death following axi-cel infusion, more patients who received bridging therapy had grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (5% vs 9%), more grade ≥ 3 neurotoxicity (28% vs 34%), higher non-relapse mortality rate (1.5% vs 7.1%) and increased death after lymphoma relapse at 12-months post-infusion (17% vs 37%).
To evaluate the differences in baseline characteristics between patients who did not receive bridging therapy, and those who did, patients were matched by propensity score. In total, 104 patients were identified and matched in each group. Following the matching, baseline characteristics were found to be similar, with no statistically significant differences. When analyzing PFS following propensity score matching, there was no longer a difference between patients who did not receive bridging, and those who did (HR= 1.19, p= 0.339). However, there was still a difference in OS, with patients receiving bridging having a worse OS compared to the no bridging group: HR= 1.68, p= 0.023.
The use of bridging therapy was associated with a worse OS in multivariate and propensity score matched analysis. It is possible that bridging therapy may identify a sub-group of patients with a different biology to the rest of the cohort, or alternatively that bridging therapy has an effect on the host or tumor microenvironment, ultimately affecting the efficacy of CAR T therapy. Therefore, the use of bridging therapy should be carefully considered within each specific scenario, though it is not currently recommended for patients awaiting axi-cel manufacturing.
Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.
Please spare a moment to share yours.
Please select or type your specialty
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox